On 10 February 2015 at 12:19, Jo Walsh metaz...@fastmail.net wrote:
I wish to float this draft page for discussion and possibly future
approval!
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map
I welcome this page, I think it is very useful.
One small comment - I oppose the following sentence:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015, at 07:39 PM, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map
I welcome this page, I think it is very useful.
One small comment - I oppose the following sentence:
Thank you for the comment Matthijs, I've added it to the discussion page
here,
Hi,
On 02/12/2015 08:53 PM, Jo Walsh wrote:
so I can only accept a tiny modicum of credit for
compressing it :)
... from a dry and almost legalese long-form that nobody wanted to read
into something that radiates community spirit. Credit whom credit is due ;)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jo Walsh metaz...@fastmail.net wrote:
OpenStreetMap values community cohesion over data perfection.
Could both terms be more elaborated on?
Does data perfection in practice mean adding true but not really
useful things, often in not-well-thought-out way?
Because
OpenStreetMap values community cohesion over data perfection.
Could both terms be more elaborated on?
Does data perfection in practice mean adding true but not really
useful things, often in not-well-thought-out way?
Because otherwise, we should strive to be perfect.
Ah, this is exactly
Already a great piece. This should go out to all new signups.
On Feb 10, 2015, at 4:19 AM, Jo Walsh metaz...@fastmail.net wrote:
dear all,
I wish to float this draft page for discussion and possibly future
approval!
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map
The page is a
On 11 Feb 2015 17:53, Michael Kugelmann michaelk_...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 11.02.2015 um 17:51 schrieb Mikel Maron:
Already a great piece.
+1
As a suggestion for improvement:
I'd love to have a clear statment in the way that somebody new in the
project should at least inform himself about
Hi,
Am 2015-02-11 um 17:51 schrieb Mikel Maron:
Already a great piece. This should go out to all new signups.
I agree, too. It is short enough to be shown at the signup page.
Best regards
Michael
--
Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt.
I prefer GPG encryption of emails.
Am 11.02.2015 um 17:51 schrieb Mikel Maron:
Already a great piece.
+1
As a suggestion for improvement:
I'd love to have a clear statment in the way that somebody new in the
project should at least inform himself about practice/methods and
tagging conventions used since years before
Agreed with all of the above, this is a great, concise, and friendly piece. I
would love for this to be accessible not just for new signees but available for
old timers looking for a nice refresher
—
Sent from Mailbox
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Ed Loach edlo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11
dear all,
I wish to float this draft page for discussion and possibly future
approval!
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map
The page is a summary of a draft Mappers' Code written by Frederik some
time ago after extensive discussion with the rest of the DWG. When I
signed up to the DWG
11 matches
Mail list logo