David Earl david at frankieandshadow.com writes:
I'm not saying I could have mapped it, but I have checked what
changed and explicitly verified it against independent sources.
So if somebody was tracing from Google Maps, but then you checked from
independent sources and verified the information
Now that we have Frederik's very helpful license vulnerability tool,
I've been doing some pre-emptive work in my area. Without re-opening old
wounds about the merit or otherwise of the forthcoming data loss, I'd
like to make some suggestions arising out of the patterns I've noticed
that mean
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:50 AM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
Suggestion 1
I'd like to suggest we invent a tag which says I have checked this object
for changes by non-accepters and personally verified it against sources
independent of the changes of those non-accepters who
On 04/01/2012 16:09, Toby Murray wrote:
This already exists in the form of the odbl=clean tag. Anything tagged
this way will show up green in Frederik's map. It is documented here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Remapping/License_Change_View_on_OSM_Inspector
Thanks, I hadn't seen that.
David,
On 01/04/12 16:50, David Earl wrote:
Suggestion 1
I'd like to suggest we invent a tag which says I have checked this
object for changes by non-accepters and personally verified it against
sources independent of the changes of those non-accepters who made
changes, so that when that tag
On 04/01/2012 16:34, Frederik Ramm wrote:
odbl=clean is that tag, and already used by OSMI and editors. It is a
bit questionable to use it on stuff that I could have mapped myself.
I suggest that odbl=clean only be added if you have indeed modified the
object in a way that you believe
6 matches
Mail list logo
