On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am maintaining personal database of issues and problems in my city[1].
Most of it is about cycling-related problems.
Another example:
https://bikeeastbay.org/hazards_map
2015-03-08 16:01 GMT+01:00 Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com:
Subdivision of the hazard namespace
To me it would come naturally to subdivide the namespace as follows for
different users of the road:
- hazard:general=
- hazard:pedestrian=
- hazard:motor_vehicle=
-
On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 15:26:38 +0100,
Stefan Keller wrote:
What about crowdsourcing dangerous bicycle locations using key/tag
hazard? See http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:hazard
And see also https://twitter.com/sfkeller/status/574213951644368896
tl;dr: As a lot of others already said: a quite
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
Sharp curves .. would they not be obvious from the map it self .. one
node on the sharp corner compared to many for a 'smooth' corner.'Masked'
corners where some object hides on coming traffic (e.g. building,
vegetation) are
To me it's almost undisputed that traffic signs - including warning
signs for cyclists - can be and are mapped.
-S.
2015-03-10 21:33 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
Sharp curves .. would they not be obvious from
On 10 March 2015 at 08:30, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
These hazards exist for all kinds of traffic and not indicated on maps.
Usually people are expected to be aware of their surroundings, not to rely
on other aids as to what is visually obvious? :-\
The idea here is not to use it
On 9/03/2015 9:08 PM, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
On 09/03/2015, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
There are in places bicycle specific warning signs (e.g. sharp curve
bicylists beware)
and THOSE can definitely be mapped.
Agreed, we can probably draw the line on wether the hazard is
On 09/03/2015, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
Sharp curves .. would they not be obvious from the map it self .. one
node on the sharp corner compared to many for a 'smooth' corner.'Masked'
corners where some object hides on coming traffic (e.g. building,
vegetation) are also a hazard.
There are in places bicycle specific warning signs (e.g. sharp curve
bicylists beware)
and THOSE can definitely be mapped.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 09/03/2015, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
There are in places bicycle specific warning signs (e.g. sharp curve
bicylists beware)
and THOSE can definitely be mapped.
Agreed, we can probably draw the line on wether the hazard is
signposted. And most of the values in taginfo and
2015-03-08 12:24 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
Am 08.03.2015 um 11:53 schrieb Stefan Keller sfkel...@gmail.com:
I actually wonder, if this is a case for WikiProject Cleanup?
+1, the German page is not a translation of the proposal page, but the
latter is much
Am 07.03.2015 um 16:34 schrieb Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org:
See http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:hazard
And see also https://twitter.com/sfkeller/status/574213951644368896
Sounds very subjective to me. Doesn't belong in OSM.
the German page does indeed define subjective values while
This survey might be of interest for (at least the Berlin part of) you.
https://radsicherheit.berlin.de
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Am 08.03.2015 um 11:53 schrieb Stefan Keller sfkel...@gmail.com:
I actually wonder, if this is a case for WikiProject Cleanup?
+1, the German page is not a translation of the proposal page, but the latter
is much older and dates back to 2007.
cheers
Martin
Hi,
Thanks for the discussion so long. I agree mostly that 1. its
potentially subjective and 2. not always visible as real world
object.
I've added a notice to the german page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:hazard
I actually wonder, if this is a case for WikiProject Cleanup?
Yours,
dieterdre...@gmail.com
To: Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Mapping dangerous bicycle locations?
Message-ID: 7770f6f0-c8ef-46cf-bdfa-bdb7231fe...@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Am 07.03.2015 um 16
I've brought this up before, but have since gone with the general consensus
that this is just too subjective, even if we were to come up with some kind
of rubric to standardize things. A big and highly inconsistent issue
between regions is regional attitude. I don't care for on-street riding,
Hi,
What about crowdsourcing dangerous bicycle locations using key/tag hazard?
See http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:hazard
And see also https://twitter.com/sfkeller/status/574213951644368896
Yours, S.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Sa, Mär 07, 2015 at 03:26:38 +0100, Stefan Keller wrote:
What about crowdsourcing dangerous bicycle locations using key/tag hazard?
See http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:hazard
And see also https://twitter.com/sfkeller/status/574213951644368896
Sounds very subjective to me. Doesn't belong in
The suggests values of
weather related - rain/snow will change with the weather .. naturally.
slippery = surface related ... could be tagged with surface=?
glass-shard .. can be cleaned up, thus temporary like the weather ... I
have stopped and swept things off the path .. used some cardboard
20 matches
Mail list logo
