On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:53 AM, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.ukwrote:
Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
The entry level editor could reasonably limit new users to entry level
edits.
Messing with anything with a relation is not a first edit kind of
activity.
What if the entry level editor said
Am 19.03.2014 18:03, schrieb Bryce Nesbitt:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:53 AM, SomeoneElse
li...@mail.atownsend.org.ukwrote:
Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
The entry level editor could reasonably limit new users to entry level
edits.
Messing with anything with a relation is not a first edit kind of
The entry level editor could reasonably limit new users to entry level
edits.
Messing with anything with a relation is not a first edit kind of activity.
What if the entry level editor said hey, this is too complex, map
something else
and gain some experience and come back to this section.
The
Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
The entry level editor could reasonably limit new users to entry
level edits.
Messing with anything with a relation is not a first edit kind of
activity.
What if the entry level editor said hey, this is too complex, map
something else
and gain some experience and come
Hi everyone,
Just wanted to give you a quick heads-up... Since 8th March user
cityeditor1000 (see [1]) has been active (77 changesets in just a couple
of days) in several areas across the globe, including India, North Wales
and various parts of the USA.
I can't easily judge the validity of
Colin Smale wrote:
I don't wish to cause offence... Perhaps someone more tactful than me
would consider contacting the user to advise caution?
It looks like someone's already fixing the broken relations; I'd have
thought that it's probably best that they do it as they'll be familiar
6 matches
Mail list logo