Re: [OSM-talk] Nominatim - Does it use the is_in tag?

2016-08-16 Thread Dave F
On 16/08/2016 21:35, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: Wouldn't that lead to "mapping for the geocoder"? I'm sure that would be frowned upon as much as "mapping for the renderer". All tags are 'mapping for the renderer/geocoder/router. Otherwise you have just black lines, lots of 'You are here' signs

Re: [OSM-talk] Nominatim - Does it use the is_in tag?

2016-08-16 Thread Sarah Hoffmann
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 09:50:05PM +0200, Hakuch wrote: > Hey Sarah, do you have documentations that explain how nominatim > processes the queries? That could be an answer to questions like that one Not really. You can have a look at the presentation I gave at SOTM Birmingham[1] but it's a bit

Re: [OSM-talk] Nominatim - Does it use the is_in tag?

2016-08-16 Thread Nicolás Alvarez
Wouldn't that lead to "mapping for the geocoder"? I'm sure that would be frowned upon as much as "mapping for the renderer". -- Nicolás 2016-08-16 16:50 GMT-03:00 Hakuch : > Hey Sarah, do you have documentations that explain how nominatim > processes the queries? That could be

Re: [OSM-talk] Nominatim - Does it use the is_in tag?

2016-08-16 Thread Hakuch
Hey Sarah, do you have documentations that explain how nominatim processes the queries? That could be an answer to questions like that one On 16.08.2016 21:27, Sarah Hoffmann wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 02:29:26PM +0100, Dave F wrote: >> Hi >> >> I've heard a claim from a user who still

Re: [OSM-talk] Nominatim - Does it use the is_in tag?

2016-08-16 Thread Sarah Hoffmann
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 02:29:26PM +0100, Dave F wrote: > Hi > > I've heard a claim from a user who still wants to use the is_in:* > tag as well as boundary tags that Nominatim uses is_in as preference > because "geospacial mathematics is resource intensive". > > Is this true? Not at all.

Re: [OSM-talk] Nominatim - Does it use the is_in tag?

2016-08-16 Thread Andy Townsend
On 16/08/2016 16:19, Hakuch wrote: following the wiki, its not deprecated https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is_in I was surprised when I read that the other day too... However, I really would love to see a scheme that shows how nominatim finds it results.. There's the

Re: [OSM-talk] Nominatim - Does it use the is_in tag?

2016-08-16 Thread Hakuch
following the wiki, its not deprecated https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is_in However, I really would love to see a scheme that shows how nominatim finds it results.. On 16.08.2016 15:29, Dave F wrote: > Hi > > I've heard a claim from a user who still wants to use the is_in:* tag as >

[OSM-talk] Nominatim - Does it use the is_in tag?

2016-08-16 Thread Dave F
Hi I've heard a claim from a user who still wants to use the is_in:* tag as well as boundary tags that Nominatim uses is_in as preference because "geospacial mathematics is resource intensive". Is this true? I thought geospacial calculations were fairly light on processing power. I also