Re: [OSM-talk] OSM for government (joost schouppe)

2017-02-04 Thread Peter Mooney
or government (Tomas Straupis) >5. Re: OSM for government (Michael Andersen) > > > -- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:24:22 -0500 > From: john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> > To: Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com> >

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM for government (joost schouppe)

2017-02-03 Thread john whelan
We have something similar in Ottawa, three bits of Government, Gatineau, Ottawa and a federal body called the NCC. Each have their own maps that overlap of their paths for cyclists. OSM is more complete than anything but all three do have Open Data with I understand designated cycle paths. They

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM for government (joost schouppe)

2017-02-03 Thread Volker Schmidt
I cannot contribute cases where such a collaboration actually happened, but two very practical examples where it would be extremely useful. Both regard bicycle aspects of OSM. In my part of the world (Italy) the regional administration has no region-wide data on - cycling infrastructure (bicycle