Michal Migurski schrieb:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=37.819252lon=-122.25409zoom=18layers=B000FTFT
I've used the layer tag in what I think is the right way, but the
Macarthur Blvd overpass (layer=3, bridge=yes) is now being shown
underneath the I580 overpass (layer=2, bridge=yes).
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 20:02 -0700, Michal Migurski wrote:
Hello,
I've just made some edits to this interchange:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=37.819252lon=-122.25409zoom=18layers=B000FTFT
I've used the layer tag in what I think is the right way, but the
Macarthur Blvd
Jon Burgess wrote:
Layer name=bridges status=on srs=...
[snip]
These rules will draw the motorway bridges above any secondary bridges
regardless of the layering. I don't understand the logic behind the
current rules, I believe they were done like this to fix some layering
issues in some
On Jun 21, 2009, at 4:46 AM, Jon Burgess wrote:
The tagging seems reasonable. The current rendering is down to the
rules
in the oxm.xml:
Layer name=bridges status=on srs=...
StyleNameroad-bridges-casing/StyleName
StyleNameroad-bridges-fill/StyleName
Hello,
I've just made some edits to this interchange:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=37.819252lon=-122.25409zoom=18layers=B000FTFT
I've used the layer tag in what I think is the right way, but the
Macarthur Blvd overpass (layer=3, bridge=yes) is now being shown
underneath the
5 matches
Mail list logo