Re: [OSM-talk] Proper use of layer tag with the Mapnik renderer?

2009-06-21 Thread Peter Herison
Michal Migurski schrieb: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=37.819252lon=-122.25409zoom=18layers=B000FTFT I've used the layer tag in what I think is the right way, but the Macarthur Blvd overpass (layer=3, bridge=yes) is now being shown underneath the I580 overpass (layer=2, bridge=yes).

Re: [OSM-talk] Proper use of layer tag with the Mapnik renderer?

2009-06-21 Thread Jon Burgess
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 20:02 -0700, Michal Migurski wrote: Hello, I've just made some edits to this interchange: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=37.819252lon=-122.25409zoom=18layers=B000FTFT I've used the layer tag in what I think is the right way, but the Macarthur Blvd

Re: [OSM-talk] Proper use of layer tag with the Mapnik renderer?

2009-06-21 Thread Lennard
Jon Burgess wrote: Layer name=bridges status=on srs=... [snip] These rules will draw the motorway bridges above any secondary bridges regardless of the layering. I don't understand the logic behind the current rules, I believe they were done like this to fix some layering issues in some

Re: [OSM-talk] Proper use of layer tag with the Mapnik renderer?

2009-06-21 Thread Michal Migurski
On Jun 21, 2009, at 4:46 AM, Jon Burgess wrote: The tagging seems reasonable. The current rendering is down to the rules in the oxm.xml: Layer name=bridges status=on srs=... StyleNameroad-bridges-casing/StyleName StyleNameroad-bridges-fill/StyleName

[OSM-talk] Proper use of layer tag with the Mapnik renderer?

2009-06-20 Thread Michal Migurski
Hello, I've just made some edits to this interchange: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=37.819252lon=-122.25409zoom=18layers=B000FTFT I've used the layer tag in what I think is the right way, but the Macarthur Blvd overpass (layer=3, bridge=yes) is now being shown underneath the