Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed repeated mechanical edit: Empty relations

2014-06-25 Thread colliar
Am 24.06.2014 07:12, schrieb Paul Norman: I completed the edit without issues. https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2270 opened for one source. JOSM had a few too, but those cover more versions so don't show up at the top. Thanks for your work. Could you please post complete numbers ?

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed repeated mechanical edit: Empty relations

2014-06-23 Thread Paul Norman
I completed the edit without issues. https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2270 opened for one source. JOSM had a few too, but those cover more versions so don't show up at the top. I manually handled relations which had other relations parents, and in ever case it was an error of some

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed repeated mechanical edit: Empty relations

2014-06-18 Thread Werner Hoch
Hi, some years ago I've started this article in the wiki about empty relations, the reasons and the cleanup: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Empty_relations Am Montag, den 16.06.2014, 13:17 -0700 schrieb Paul Norman: I'm proposing a regular mechanical edit to remove relations over two

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed repeated mechanical edit: Empty relations

2014-06-17 Thread Serge Wroclawski
This seems reasonable to me. With these kinds of objects, there's really no easy way to understand the editor's intent, and figuring that out would very likely be more work that re-doing it. - Serge ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

[OSM-talk] Proposed repeated mechanical edit: Empty relations

2014-06-16 Thread Paul Norman
I'm proposing a regular mechanical edit to remove relations over two days old with no tags, no members, and that are version 1. The reasons for this are hopefully obvious. They should only exist through editor bugs, and contain no data from users of any kind. There are currently 1.4k relations

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed repeated mechanical edit: Empty relations

2014-06-16 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 06/16/2014 10:17 PM, Paul Norman wrote: I'm proposing a regular mechanical edit to remove relations over two days old with no tags, no members, and that are version 1. I think you might be too conservative with the version 1 requirement; I think that you could probably drop any of

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed repeated mechanical edit: Empty relations

2014-06-16 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 16/giu/2014 um 23:01 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org: I think you might be too conservative with the version 1 requirement; I think that you could probably drop any of these relations even if they have higher version numbers. if the version is 1 it might make sense to see

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed repeated mechanical edit: Empty relations

2014-06-16 Thread Clifford Snow
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: Before actually conducting the edit, I want to see what editors were used, and submit bug reports if there's any regular problems. I'm curious, can you get a count of empty relations by editor and age? Basically, current,

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed repeated mechanical edit: Empty relations

2014-06-16 Thread Paul Norman
On 2014-06-16 3:55 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: I'm curious, can you get a count of empty relations by editor and age? Basically, current, and then yearly? There have been past cleanups, so what you're talking about would need to involve looking at historical data, which I don't have loaded up,