I suppose this brings up all the stuff about path tagging again, but, how
do people in general tag vague, ill-defined countryside paths?
The sort of things I'm talking about are either very narrow and
occasionally hard to follow paths through woods, or, firebreaks in forests
where there is
I suppose this brings up all the stuff about path tagging again, but, how
do people in general tag vague, ill-defined countryside paths?
The sort of things I'm talking about are either very narrow and
occasionally hard to follow paths through woods, or, firebreaks in forests
where there is
I use
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=path/Examples
and have concluded to use
highway=path, wheelchair=no
The first tag classifies the way as being an unpaved and small path while the
second clarifies that you can't use it for anything on wheels.
Are you sure?
Roland Olbricht wrote:
I suppose this brings up all the stuff about path tagging again, but, how
do people in general tag vague, ill-defined countryside paths?
The sort of things I'm talking about are either very narrow and
occasionally hard to follow paths through woods, or, firebreaks
you may add a visibility tag, if it's rough terrain also sac_scale may
apply
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility
On 26 Aug 2009, at 7:25 , Nick Whitelegg wrote:
I suppose this brings up all the stuff about path tagging again,
but, how
do people in general tag vague,
On 08/26/2009 10:19 AM, Roland Olbricht wrote:
I use
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=path/Examples
and have concluded to use
highway=path, wheelchair=no
The first tag classifies the way as being an unpaved and small path...
It does nothing of the sort. unpaved would require
6 matches
Mail list logo
