[OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement

2008-10-17 Thread Tristan Scott
This is a voting request for traffic_enforcement (as no-one seems to know about it?) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Traffic_enforcement I'd appreciate if lots of people could go vote on this so we can have it approved - I for one would find it invaluable. Such an item

Re: [OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement

2008-10-17 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 17.10.2008, at 13:46, Tristan Scott wrote: I'd appreciate if lots of people could go vote on this so we can have it approved - I for one would find it invaluable. Then don't wait - just use it. If there is *anything* you find invaluable, don't wait for others to say they find it too

Re: [OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement

2008-10-17 Thread Tristan Scott
Hmm. noting the comments on votes about tag highway it seems that it would be a better scheme to use traffic_enforcement=speed instead of both highway=traffic_enforcement AND enforcement_type=speed Now - this isn't my proposal, I'm just rather keen and willing to try to help. What's the correct

Re: [OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement

2008-10-17 Thread David Groom
- Original Message - From: Tristan Scott To: Frederik Ramm Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 4:32 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement Hmm. noting the comments on votes about tag highway it seems that it would be a better scheme

Re: [OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement

2008-10-17 Thread Tristan Scott
: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 4:32 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement Hmm. noting the comments on votes about tag highway it seems that it would be a better scheme to use traffic_enforcement=speed instead of both highway=traffic_enforcement

Re: [OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement

2008-10-17 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 06:40:12PM +0100, Tristan Scott wrote: * Common mobile station on a bridge - on a way which has no relation to the direction of enforcement In that case, a relation (no pun intended) would be better. * On a crossroads/traffic signals (red light camera) where two ways

Re: [OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement

2008-10-17 Thread Ben Laenen
On Friday 17 October 2008, Tristan Scott wrote: righto; votes cleared. proposal modified. new vote set in a week's time. I'm not keen on the enforcement direction being forwards and backwards. I can think of examples: * Common mobile station on a bridge - on a way which has no relation to

Re: [OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement

2008-10-17 Thread Ed Loach
Haven't seen any cases where the same camera covers both directions of a dual carriageway, but if it happens somewhere, why not just add two nodes on each side? How about those cases where the camera is between the carriageways and gets swung around to cover opposite sides at irregular