2010/5/28 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
Good to see that nobody cares about the wiki inconsistencies of 'locality'.
give us some time, not everybody can read everything within some hours.
at
Good to see that nobody cares about the wiki inconsistencies of 'locality'.
Then I will fix it directly with the 'unpopulated place' version.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On the wiki, we need to clarify some places definitions after some recent
(or not)
On 28 May 2010 19:00, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
Good to see that nobody cares about the wiki inconsistencies of 'locality'.
Then I will fix it directly with the 'unpopulated place' version.
Good to see you waited a couple of days to see if people would reply
before assuming no one
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
Good to see that nobody cares about the wiki inconsistencies of 'locality'.
I didn't reply because your original email didn't ask a clear
question. Are you proposing something in particular? I'll try to
comment nonetheless:
at
On the wiki, we need to clarify some places definitions after some recent
(or not) changes:
place=locality:
at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Locality:
- place tags are for either populated areas, or for larger areas of County
sized or bigger (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Locality).
5 matches
Mail list logo
