Re: [OSM-talk] a, b and c.tile.openstreetmap.org refer to the same server?

2015-05-19 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 01:03:32AM +0200, Stefan Baebler wrote: 18. maj 2015 10.30 pop. je oseba Andrew Guertin andrew.guer...@uvm.edu napisala: Whether the new limits are sufficiently high for OSM I haven't investigated enough to answer. Browser limits, network speeds and screen

Re: [OSM-talk] a, b and c.tile.openstreetmap.org refer to the same server?

2015-05-18 Thread Andrew Guertin
On 05/17/2015 11:09 AM, Jochen Topf wrote: (Modern browsers probably don't have this limitation any more, sombody should probably check whether we need the a/b/c stuff any more.) I gave this a quick check, Firefox's was last changed in 2008:

Re: [OSM-talk] a, b and c.tile.openstreetmap.org refer to the same server?

2015-05-18 Thread Stefan Baebler
18. maj 2015 10.30 pop. je oseba Andrew Guertin andrew.guer...@uvm.edu napisala: Whether the new limits are sufficiently high for OSM I haven't investigated enough to answer. Browser limits, network speeds and screen resolutions all increased in the recent years, but tile size stayed at 256*256.

Re: [OSM-talk] a, b and c.tile.openstreetmap.org refer to the same server?

2015-05-17 Thread Richard Z.
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 05:09:59PM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote: On So, Mai 17, 2015 at 04:46:24 +0200, Maarten Deen wrote: Is it normal that the a, b and c.tile.openstreetmap.org IP-adresses refer to the same server? For me, they all refer to amsterdam.tile.openstreetmap.org and for some

Re: [OSM-talk] a, b and c.tile.openstreetmap.org refer to the same server?

2015-05-17 Thread Jochen Topf
On So, Mai 17, 2015 at 04:46:24 +0200, Maarten Deen wrote: Is it normal that the a, b and c.tile.openstreetmap.org IP-adresses refer to the same server? For me, they all refer to amsterdam.tile.openstreetmap.org and for some reason it is not responding very well (lots of read times out

Re: [OSM-talk] a, b and c.tile.openstreetmap.org refer to the same server?

2015-05-17 Thread Grant Slater
On 17 May 2015 at 16:30, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 05:09:59PM +0200, Jochen Topf wrote: On So, Mai 17, 2015 at 04:46:24 +0200, Maarten Deen wrote: Is it normal that the a, b and c.tile.openstreetmap.org IP-adresses refer to the same server? For me, they

[OSM-talk] a, b and c.tile.openstreetmap.org refer to the same server?

2015-05-17 Thread Maarten Deen
Is it normal that the a, b and c.tile.openstreetmap.org IP-adresses refer to the same server? For me, they all refer to amsterdam.tile.openstreetmap.org and for some reason it is not responding very well (lots of read times out messages in JOSM). To me it would seem more logical to have

Re: [OSM-talk] a, b and c.tile.openstreetmap.org refer to the same server?

2015-05-17 Thread Svavar Kjarrval
The problem the feature was supposed to solve is more or less solved in HTTP/2. However, the specification was only formally published this month so the a/b/c subdomains will probably need to be active for some time longer due to older software (eg. browsers) which will probably not utilise HTTP/2