On 16 February 2010 02:13, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:10 PM, James Stewart j.k.stew...@ed.ac.uk wrote:
Getting back to those walkers, though. Navteq says it's identified four
features requested by large numbers of users when they're on foot. They are:
Op 19-02-10 00:31, andrzej zaborowski schreef:
I've been thinking for some time about putting together a database of
methods to access public transport schedules for places around the
world, it could be python code snippets or even better javascript code
or something else.
I like this idea,
Roy Wallace wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:10 PM, James Stewart j.k.stew...@ed.ac.uk wrote:
and micro maps of destinations such as airports and shopping malls
I think this is quite important, and can be one of the strengths of
OSM. e.g. Plenty of POI's waiting to be mapped here:
Roy Wallace wrote:
This is good; we're doing well with highway=path/footway
As John suggested, I think there talking out urban areas such as how to
get from Marks Spencers to Tescos Local via a Costa Lot coffee house.
I don't think that Navteq's users Jimmy Choo's are ever going to get mud
on
Steve Doerr wrote:
How accurate are GPS receivers inside buildings?
Not very, but don't be limited to your unit.
Use photos, pen paper (see Walking Papers)
http://walking-papers.org/
Cheers
Dave F.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 16 February 2010 22:49, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
I don't think that Navteq's users Jimmy Choo's are ever going to get mud
on them.
Maybe they can get some paint on mud like they do for 4wd;s that never
leave the city :)
___
talk
http://www.mobile-ent.biz/news/36033/MWC-2010-Two-thirds-of-mobile-users-want-driving-AND-walking-navigation
MWC 2010: Two thirds of mobile users want driving AND walking navigation
by Stuart Dredge | Email a friend | PrintAdd a comment
Two legs good, four tyres not necessarily better
A
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:10 PM, James Stewart j.k.stew...@ed.ac.uk wrote:
Getting back to those walkers, though. Navteq says it's identified four
features requested by large numbers of users when they're on foot. They are:
public transport information including real-time data;
Well, OSM can
On 16 February 2010 11:13, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
This is good; we're doing well with highway=path/footway
I wonder if they asked about cycling at all, or limited it to just
walking/cars...
___
talk mailing list
9 matches
Mail list logo
