Hi,
Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
I meant Do all the polygon parts get their correct names in
rendering,
There are multiple renderers and they generally don't agree on how to
handle multipolygons.
I would assume that most can deal with a hole of a multipolygon having
its own identity (e.g. hole in
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
A further problem arises when the hole boundary consists of multiple
ways, something that is allowed for advanced multipolygons, but you
would not be able to place the name of the island (or whatever) in this
scenario.
Hi,
Anthony wrote:
A further problem arises when the hole boundary consists of multiple
ways, something that is allowed for advanced multipolygons, but you
would not be able to place the name of the island (or whatever) in this
scenario.
You could if you used a second multipolygon with the
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Personally, I am hoping that we will (re)introduce a proper
area data type some day because even though the multipolygons
were a good idea at the time, they do seem a bit clumsy now.
I agree. Areas will come ever more complicated with data imports and
tracing from high
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Anthony wrote:
Do advanced multipolygons have to have an inner?
No.
Great.
Personally, I am hoping that we will (re)introduce a proper area data type
some day because even though the multipolygons were a good idea at
Hi,
Anthony wrote:
What would be the advantage of an area data type? Would this be a
separate table or just a type of relation?
Exactly what advantage(s) it has of course depends on how it is designed
and implemented in the end.
The problem with our current approach is that we are mixing
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
The other is multipolygons, where we (ab)use the relation object which is
*normally* used to model a relation between several primitives, to actually
construct a primitive in the first place. Constructing the geo-object
Jon Burgess jburgess777 at googlemail.com writes:
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 13:41 +0200, Peter Herison wrote:
But if the inner member is also an island? Eventually the island is also
covered with wood? How to tag the inner way in this case?
In that case tag the inner way with natural=wood.
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Jukka Rahkonen
jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi wrote:
Jon Burgess jburgess777 at googlemail.com writes:
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 13:41 +0200, Peter Herison wrote:
But if the inner member is also an island? Eventually the island is also
covered with wood? How to
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason avarab at gmail.com writes:
jukka.rahkonen at mmmtike.fi wrote:
Could it be possible to have a tagging rule that would be usable for all
islands? Island is always an island and it is also always dry land (I
suppose)
but all islands are not natural=wood. Would
Hi,
Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
For what? The inner ways of multipolygons where the outer way is
tagged as natural=water? You don't need to tag them with anything
indicating that they're an island, they already are tagged as islands
implicitly since they're a multipolygon.
Islands tend to have
-Original Message-
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:49:16
To: Rahkonen Jukkajukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon (lake) not rendering
Hi,
Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
For what? The inner ways of multipolygons where
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon (lake) not rendering
Hi,
Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
For what? The inner ways of multipolygons where the outer way is
tagged as natural=water? You don't need to tag them with anything
indicating that they're an island, they already are tagged as islands
Could somebody take a look at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/300524 and why it's not
rendering in mapnik?
There are also some issues with osmarender:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=29.5216lon=-101.0699zoom=12layers=0B00FTF
___
talk
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Peter Herison pheri...@web.de wrote:
Could somebody take a look at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/300524 and why it's not
rendering in mapnik?
There are also some issues with osmarender:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason schrieb:
Peter Herison pheri...@web.de wrote:
Could somebody take a look at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/300524 and why it's
not rendering in mapnik?
There are also some issues with osmarender:
On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 13:41 +0200, Peter Herison wrote:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason schrieb:
Peter Herison pheri...@web.de wrote:
Could somebody take a look at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/300524 and why it's
not rendering in mapnik?
There are also some issues with
I think you mean natural=water - natural=lake is undocumented ;-)
I'd understand natural=lakeshore - but that's undocumented too
Roman
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:07:59 +
From: ?var Arnfj?r? Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] multipolygon (lake) not rendering
To: Peter
18 matches
Mail list logo
