From: SteveC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 9 June 2008 12:44:49 BDT
To: 80n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: OSM Talk <talk@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] noname streets
coz it makes me think of no=yes
and that would just be silly
On 9 Jun 2008, at 12:43, 80n wrote:
noname=yes seems like a perfectly good solution. Why do you think
it might not be optimal?
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:25 AM, SteveC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I didn't find much on the wiki, has anyone looked at defining streets
without names?
I'd like to define some roads that really don't have a name so that
they drop off the noname map.
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~random/no-names/
I've been adding noname:yes but I can see that might not be optimal.
Maybe name:__none__. Or something.
Best
Steve
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Best
Steve
Hasn't 80n got a degree in philosophy? If so no=yes might not be too
much of a problem ;-)
elvin
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
