I noticed recently that my shift correction (using JOSM) for Marikina
is not consistent anymore for some areas (within the same imagery).
Is there some shift in your respective patch?
--
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea
R1 extension is not fully passable at the moment.
The southbound side up to Kawit is now open to Class 1 and 2 vehicles.
Class 3 will be allowed after Holy Week.
The northbound side is still closed.
I'll try to get a trace this Holy Week since I expect there would be
no traffic. :-)
On Fri,
No shift on my patch (Muntinlupa and Las Pinas).
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 6:52 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed recently that my shift correction (using JOSM) for Marikina
is not consistent anymore for some areas (within the same imagery).
Is there some shift in
GpsMid
Java Midlet to use OpenStreetMap data on a J2ME ready Mobile. Displays a moving
map using external or internal GPS, shows the street name on which you are.
There is Navigation support for car drivers, bicyclists and pedestrians plus
many more ...
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gpsmid/
Thanks, maybe my local shift correction is misplaced in some areas.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
No shift on my patch (Muntinlupa and Las Pinas).
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 6:52 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed
On 18 April 2011 02:13, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Presumably they would point out that the incorrect part of your
reasoning is that Re-distribution under a licence is sublicensing and
cannot be anything else.
Redistribution under a license is not sublicensing. I'm not even
quite sure
There are some errors in the Italian translation of the
contributor terms https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/terms
License names contains typos:
* ODbl sould be ODbL (the case)
* DdCL should be DbCL (b instead of d)
The phrase le quali saranno si intenderanno approvate con il
voto should be
That is the situation you are describing.
I'm not sure what you mean by the situation you are describing, but
Ah, this is where we are probably at cross purposes. I am sorry for
that - its been a long thread. 80n's original query concerned
uploading work to OSMF by someone who has agreed to
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 07:34:57AM +0200, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 18 April 2011 07:26, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote:
Thanks Grant,
I understand what the OSMF stands for, and my question was maybe
unclear:
What does this phrase (about the
On 04/18/2011 10:06 PM, Simon Ward wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 07:34:57AM +0200, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Commercial use needs to be allowed for the data to even be considered
open knowledge according to http://www.opendefinition.org/okd/ .
Since this is often a deciding factor for
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 7:38 AM, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote:
While I certainly understand the pro-PD argument, what would folks
think about putting the checkbox after the submit button?
I agree, it should be done
It's rather degrading saying this
On Monday 18 April 2011 04:47:30 Steve Coast wrote:
Today I watched a few people sign up for OSM and they all ticked the PD
box without even looking at it, it was very entertaining.
And hereby the expected anti-PD campaign is officially started.
--
m.v.g.,
Cartinus
There are some errors in the Italian translation of the
contributor terms https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/terms
License names contains typos:
* ODbl sould be ODbL (the case)
* DdCL should be DbCL (b instead of d)
The phrase le quali saranno si intenderanno approvate con il
voto should be
Perhaps the PD tickbox could be replaced with a radio button between two
choices.
One of the two must be picked before submitting.
--
Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Richard Fairhurst richard at systemed.net writes:
What's not clear is how the ODbL+DbCL licence would help this
situation. It would at least straightforwardly permit the publishing
of map tiles without any attribution or share-alike requirement
Disagree. (This has been gone over ad nauseam on
It's everyone else who we have to worry about. In the last couple of months,
I've personally noticed a national railway company, a charity with a
turnover of £100m, a vast firm of couriers, a magazine publisher, a book
publisher, all infringing our requirements/requests for attribution and
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 19:47 -0700, Steve Coast wrote:
Today I watched a few people sign up for OSM and they all ticked the PD
box without even looking at it, it was very entertaining.
Many people have become accustomed to simply checking/accepting any
terms and conditions displayed, for fear
Cartinus cartinus at xs4all.nl writes:
On Monday 18 April 2011 04:47:30 Steve Coast wrote:
Today I watched a few people sign up for OSM and they all ticked the PD
box without even looking at it, it was very entertaining.
And hereby the expected anti-PD campaign is officially started.
I
I'm finding I can't do anything at openstreetmap.org, not even visit the
home page, without accepting or declining the contributor terms. I
assume that this is because I'm logged in - hopefully a non-member just
wanting to view the map would not have this difficulty. I can't even log
out -
Hi Toby,
Good job! Thanks.
I wanna use it for japanese osm mappers.
Hiroshi
OSM Foundation Japan
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
wrote:
Could you create a graph that shows the graph since you started
collecting data in addition to or instead of just
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
Fortunately, I can get round it by using a different browser where I'm not
logged in, but it's a bit of a pain. I think it should be considered a bug.
Or a feature to make people press on 'Accept' or 'Decline ' ;)
As
Is a really good piece of work :) I think it'll be very useful ;).
The only thing I would add, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea, is a
line for the people that still have to accept or decline it ( 286581 -
agreed - disagreed). I'm only concerned about the scale that could be
screwed, but I
Am I worng or the PD-box is for statistical use only?
Fabio A Locati
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Jukka Rahkonen
jukka.rahko...@latuviitta.fi wrote:
Cartinus cartinus at xs4all.nl writes:
On Monday 18 April 2011 04:47:30 Steve Coast wrote:
Today I watched a few people sign up for OSM
Hi,
Recently, when I try to upload my edits, the server (or JOSM?) is
reporting:
Waiting 10 seconds ... OK - trying again.
then it waits 10 seconds and continues afterwards.
Is this some kind of overload protection mechanism on the server side?
Is the server been to busy? Or it is on the JOSM
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:40:45 +0200
Fabio Alessandro Locati fabioloc...@gmail.com wrote:
In all the countries I know of ticking a checkbox is comparable to
sign a printed contract, so I thin is pointless to have a written
contract or a CopyPast thing ;)
add Australia to your list of places
Ed Avis wrote:
So do the produced map tiles (a Produced Work under the ODbL,
I think, or am I mistaken there to?) have to be distributed under
the ODbL also - or can you use any distribution terms as long
as it has attribution - or what?
ODbL 4.3 allows you to distribute Produced Works
2011/4/18 Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:40:45 +0200
Fabio Alessandro Locati fabioloc...@gmail.com wrote:
In all the countries I know of ticking a checkbox is comparable to
sign a printed contract, so I thin is pointless to have a written
contract or a CopyPast
Fabio Alessandro Locati fabiolocati at gmail.com writes:
Am I worng or the PD-box is for statistical use only?
It may be there for statistics but no numbers have ever been published. The
other possible reason for the existence of the tick box is to make PD-minded
people feel happy and be
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 20:02 +1000, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:40:45 +0200
Fabio Alessandro Locati fabioloc...@gmail.com wrote:
In all the countries I know of ticking a checkbox is comparable to
sign a printed contract, so I thin is pointless to have a written
contract
I know, English is not my native one, but how it is related with
checkbox as agreeing with printed contract?
When you check that box, you agree that contract is final and valid.
If you don't want to acept the terms, you simply don't check it.
Or I don't get secret lawyers language? :)
Am 18.04.2011 11:37, Jorge Gustavo Rocha:
Hi,
Recently, when I try to upload my edits, the server (or JOSM?) is
reporting:
Waiting 10 seconds ... OK - trying again.
then it waits 10 seconds and continues afterwards.
Is this some kind of overload protection mechanism on the server side?
Is the
David Murn davey at incanberra.com.au writes:
Infact, my GPS unit upon power up displays a warning about copyright and
using while driving which you must accept, as if you try to proceed
without accepting, it instantly powers off.
What, it warns you that copyright doesn't apply? Excellent.
--
Francis
Thank you for your patience and the detail of your answers.
This whole thing is a complicated business and the subtleties when
various different licenses and so forth are combine are often
unexpected.
80n
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com wrote:
That is
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 5:39 AM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
It would seem to me that anyone who has agreed to the contributor
terms and who then edits content that is published by OSM is in breach
of the CC-BY-SA license.
It seems to me that you are confused, but I think I see where that
On 18 April 2011 15:09, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
Francis
Thank you for your patience and the detail of your answers.
This whole thing is a complicated business and the subtleties when
various different licenses and so forth are combine are often
unexpected.
That's fine. I'm always happy
Richard Fairhurst richard at systemed.net writes:
ODbL 4.3 allows you to distribute Produced Works under any licence as
long as you provide attribution.
[...] if you Publicly Use a Produced Work, You must include a notice
associated with the Produced Work reasonably calculated to make any
Person
Ed Avis eda at waniasset.com writes:
[...] if you Publicly Use a Produced Work, You must include a notice
associated with the Produced Work reasonably calculated to make any
Person that uses, views, accesses, interacts with, or is otherwise
exposed to the Produced Work aware that Content was
Ive noticed a few discrepancies with the graph..
How come on the 2-day graph, the scale for decline goes 10300 to 10800
while on 5-day graph the range is 10200 to 10800. The accept scale is
0-100 on 2-day but 0-120 on 5-day. The upshot is that the 'accepted'
value is 99.8% of the full range,
2011/4/18 David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au:
If you want to represent these important figures in statistics, can you
at least use a common scale to avoid distorting peoples views of the
figures? Using deceptive graphing methods was a trick we were taught
back in school as a child. It doesnt
For what it's worth, I just legally signed my state tax return with
nothing but a checkbox on a web form...
Toby
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Richard Weait wrote:
The OpenStreetMap database is currently available as CC-By-SA. Users
are indicating their willingness to relicense their contributions, or
not, under ODbL. Current edits are CC-By-SA. The OSM db is currently
CC-By-SA, only.
I am not sure that gets to the point 80n
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 17:25 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
It makes them readable. If you used the same scale you won't see the
handful of no-votes against the 1 yes-votes.
It appears the scales have changed, and the readability hasnt changed.
If anything the 2 lines are now more
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:25 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/4/18 David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au:
If you want to represent these important figures in statistics, can you
at least use a common scale to avoid distorting peoples views of the
figures? Using
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 10:27 -0500, Toby Murray wrote:
For what it's worth, I just legally signed my state tax return with
nothing but a checkbox on a web form...
You mean all you had to do to do your tax, was check a checkbox and
click accept? Or did you also provide information persuant to
I just saw this blog post yesterday, saying that OSM data will be used
for showing road networks in the terrain data for the X-Plane flight
simulator in version 10.
http://www.x-plane.com/blog/2011/04/openstreetmap-and-x-plane-10/
Cool stuff!
—Alex Mauer “hawke”
2011/4/18 David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au:
I suspect that the number of
places that have different contract laws is significantly higher than
those places that dont recognise CC-BY-SA,
I think you are ignoring the fact, that the problem was not whether a
country recognizes CC-BY-SA but
2011/4/18 Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net:
I just saw this blog post yesterday, saying that OSM data will be used
for showing road networks in the terrain data for the X-Plane flight
simulator in version 10.
Yes, that's cool. There is also a screenshot here:
Ed Avis wrote:
To answer my own question - I guess that 'reasonably calculated to
make...' suggests you should include an attribution notice and ask
downstream users to respect it - although it doesn't mandate any
particular choice of licence. So we would still have the attribution
On 04/18/2011 11:03 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Yes, that's cool. There is also a screenshot here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page
No, that’s a screenshot of data imported using OSM2XP. OSM2XP is a
third-party tool which imports buildings and certain scenery objects
into
2011/4/18 Thomas Davie tom.da...@gmail.com:
While I agree that there is a problem with the no votes disapearing if you
show the whole graph, it would be useful to show the same *range* on each
scale.
I.e., as we are currently showing 10300 - 10900 on the yes scale, show 0 to
600 on the no
On 18 Apr 2011, at 18:45, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/4/18 Thomas Davie tom.da...@gmail.com:
While I agree that there is a problem with the no votes disapearing if you
show the whole graph, it would be useful to show the same *range* on each
scale.
I.e., as we are currently showing
Thomas Davie wrote:
Because it will show the genuine trend – at the moment, a quick glance at
the graph would suggest that the no vote is expanding at the same rate,
and at the same level as the yes vote. I agree that we can't clearly
show that they're not at the same level, because it
2011/4/18 Thomas Davie tom.da...@gmail.com:
Because it will show the genuine trend – at the moment, a quick glance at the
graph would suggest that the no vote is expanding at the same rate, and at
the same level as the yes vote.
until today they were indeed growing at the same rate, while
Aren't you a few days late? :-)
On 4/18/2011 8:27 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
For what it's worth, I just legally signed my state tax return with
nothing but a checkbox on a web form...
Toby
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 18 Apr 2011, at 19:03, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Thomas Davie wrote:
Because it will show the genuine trend – at the moment, a quick glance at
the graph would suggest that the no vote is expanding at the same rate,
and at the same level as the yes vote. I agree that we can't clearly
This year, the deadline for filing the Federal income-tax return in the USA is
April 18th, and some states have probably altered their schedules to match.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] PD tick box
From :mailto:st...@asklater.com
Date :Mon Apr 18 13:29:00 America/Chicago
And there was me rushing to have it done by the 15th...
On 4/18/2011 11:35 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
This year, the deadline for filing the Federal income-tax return in the USA is
April 18th, and some states have probably altered their schedules to match.
---Original Email---
I agree that we can't clearly show that they're not at the same level,
because it would involve scaling the no vote to 1 100th of the size of the
yes vote, but we can clearly show that they're not expanding at the same
rate.
This is just a simple graph. It is also important to see,
Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Thomas Davie wrote:
Because it will show the genuine trend – at the moment, a quick glance at
the graph would suggest that the no vote is expanding at the same rate,
and at the same level as the yes vote. I agree that we can't clearly
show that they're not at the
As a side question: how many users still need to either accept or decline?
A lot. If you look at the two files that I am using to pull data from,
you will see the users_agreed.txt file has a header in it explaining
that there are 286,582 users that signed up before the new CT was put
into place
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
...which is ignoring the 70% or so of all of those people who never edited
and can be switched over without incident.
and the people that accepted during the registration
--
Fabio Alessandro Locati
Home: Segrate, Milan,
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
To answer my own question - I guess that 'reasonably calculated to
make...' suggests you should include an attribution notice and ask
downstream users to respect it - although it doesn't mandate any
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:49:19 -0500
Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
As a side question: how many users still need to either accept or
decline?
A lot. If you look at the two files that I am using to pull data from,
you will see the users_agreed.txt file has a header in it
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 18:35 +0100, Thomas Davie wrote:
While I agree that there is a problem with the no votes disapearing if
you show the whole graph, it would be useful to show the same *range*
on each scale.
I actually meant that the 2 graphs had different scales. When youre
showing
On 19 April 2011 00:08, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
I actually meant that the 2 graphs had different scales. When youre
showing numbers upto 80, fair enough use a scale of 0-100, but dont use
0-100 on one and 0-120 on the other, and call it an even comparison.
Skewing graphs is
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 11:53 -0700, Steve Coast wrote:
...which is ignoring the 70% or so of all of those people who never
edited and can be switched over without incident.
That sounds like the thinking of the parties in a real vote, 'if
everyone who didnt vote, voted for us, we would have
On Apr 18, 2011 9:30 AM, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
On 18 April 2011 05:05, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Frederik Ramm writes:
No. To get access to (at least TeleAtlas's or Navteq's) data you will
have to sign an agreement that binds you to much more than just
http://rweait.dev.openstreetmap.org/changeusersstacked-year.png
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Am 17.04.2011 10:17, schrieb Ed Avis:
andrzej zaborowski balrogg at gmail.com writes:
I know a relatively big project that's currently using OSM data under
CC-By-SA and may be in a nasty surprise when they find OSM is no
longer suitable.
Fortunately, there is an easy way to fix this: keep
jgrocha wrote:
Hi,
Recently, when I try to upload my edits, the server (or JOSM?) is
reporting:
Waiting 10 seconds ... OK - trying again.
then it waits 10 seconds and continues afterwards.
Is this some kind of overload protection mechanism on the server side?
Is the server been to
2011/4/18 Dirk-Lüder Kreie osm-l...@deelkar.net:
I should note that I find the bulk of your email to be reasonable and
thoughtful, whether I agree with specific points or not. So it
appears now that I'm picking on you by singling out one point from
your reasonable email. Sorry. :-)
[ ... ]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
2011-04-17 23:54, Frederik Ramm skrev:
No. To get access to (at least TeleAtlas's or Navteq's) data you will
have to sign an agreement that binds you to much more than just plain
copyright.
You just have to get into a store and give them money to
Het is geen gewone SQL, maar je mag spatiele queries gaan maken.
Lees http://postgis.refractions.net/documentation/manual-1.5/ eens door
:)
Cheers,
--Roeland
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 17:28:47 +0200, Robert Elsenaar wrote:
Om mijn vraag wat te specificeren:
Ik gebruik:
SELECT id, tags - 'name',
Hey!
Lennard en ik zijn een tijdje terug druk bezig geweest met woonplaats
(en dus ook gemeente) grenzen[1]. Je schema zoals je het beschrijft
klopt wel zoals je kan zien op [2].
Echter als je de hiërarchie wil behouden zou ik een admin_level=12
introduceren en daarvan dan buurten maken. Het
Je wordt bedankt ;-)
Als dyslectisch persoon is dat altijd al mijn hobby. ;-)
Robert
Citeren Roeland Douma u...@rullzer.com:
Het is geen gewone SQL, maar je mag spatiele queries gaan maken.
Lees http://postgis.refractions.net/documentation/manual-1.5/ eens door :)
Cheers,
--Roeland
On
Thx,
Kan ik de Stripclubs tenminste wer vinden. ;-)
Robert
Citeren Roeland Douma u...@rullzer.com:
Hij doet het weer :)
Groet,
--Roeland
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:48:04 +0200, Lennard wrote:
On 17-4-2011 17:46, Rob wrote:
poiexport draait niet op mijndev maar op productie, dat even
Roeland,
Is dit ook nog een actief project of is deze reeds afgerond?
Robert
Citeren Roeland Douma u...@rullzer.com:
Hey!
Lennard en ik zijn een tijdje terug druk bezig geweest met woonplaats
(en dus ook gemeente) grenzen[1]. Je schema zoals je het beschrijft
klopt wel zoals je kan zien op
Kunnen we hier misschien de categorie Oplaadpunten aan toevoegen?
amenity=charging_station
of
amenity=fuel met fuel:electricity=yes
Groet,
Floris
2011/4/18 rob...@elsenaar.info:
Thx,
Kan ik de Stripclubs tenminste wer vinden. ;-)
Robert
Citeren Roeland Douma u...@rullzer.com:
Hij
Ja .. hallo ...
Je gaat ons toch niet vertellen dat een OSM Mappende Fietsers met
ELECTRISCHE fietsen rond rijden .. toch?
Ik moet het moment nog beleven dat ik al wandelend langs een dergelijk
oplaadpunt loop en daar Ldp, Ligfietser of zelfs Noordfiets zie staan.
Ik zou
2011/4/18 rob...@elsenaar.info:
Je gaat ons toch niet vertellen dat een OSM Mappende Fietsers met
ELECTRISCHE fietsen rond rijden .. toch?
Ik moet het moment nog beleven dat ik al wandelend langs een dergelijk
oplaadpunt loop en daar Ldp, Ligfietser of zelfs Noordfiets zie staan. Ik
Nee, dit gaat om auto oplaadpunten, alhoewel ze op bijvoorbeeld het
Sciencepark steevast in beslag worden genomen door scooters.
Die dingen springen hier in Amsterdam als paddestoelen uit de grond
tegenwoordig.
Groet,
Floris
2011/4/18 rob...@elsenaar.info:
Ja .. hallo ...
Je gaat
Ik zal als ik thuis ben zal ik even kijken wat ik voor je kan doen.
Misschien maar een groen thema-kaartje maken ook?
Groet,
--Roeland
On Monday 18 April 2011 16:43:01 Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
Nee, dit gaat om auto oplaadpunten, alhoewel ze op bijvoorbeeld het
Sciencepark steevast in beslag
On 18-4-2011 9:47, Roeland Douma wrote:
Echter als je de hiërarchie wil behouden zou ik een admin_level=12
introduceren en daarvan dan buurten maken. Het slaat natuurlijk nergens
We hebben gewoon erg veel onderverdelingen in NL. Nu al een 12 nodig?
Poeh he.
Een gemeente met stadsdelen kan
On 18-4-2011 13:39, rob...@elsenaar.info wrote:
Roeland,
Is dit ook nog een actief project of is deze reeds afgerond?
Onze inmenging (het opvragen van woonplaatsbesluiten bij gemeenten en
deze daarna invoeren in OSM) is op een erg laag pitje komen te staan,
onder andere door het werk aan
On Monday 18 April 2011 20:51:32 Lennard wrote:
On 18-4-2011 9:47, Roeland Douma wrote:
Echter als je de hiërarchie wil behouden zou ik een admin_level=12
introduceren en daarvan dan buurten maken. Het slaat natuurlijk nergens
We hebben gewoon erg veel onderverdelingen in NL. Nu al een
On 18-4-2011 23:31, Oliver Heesakkers wrote:
Daar ben ik het onmiddellijk mee eens. Het is al erg genoeg dat wij
(samen met de Duitsers) een level meer nodig zouden hebben dan de rest
van de wereld (waarvan we er dan ook nog eens twee niet gebruiken!)
Niet veel landen zijn al zo ver dat ze
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 02:28:23PM +0200, Fabian Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
mit der Verfügbarkeit einer Liste[1] der Nutzer, die den
Lizenzwechsel ablehnen, hab ich die Lizenzwechselkarte[2] umgefärbt
und unterscheide jetzt drei Nutzergruppen, accept (grün), decline
(rot) und den Rest (blau), sowie
Hi
irgendwann wird ja sowas wie IQ routes etc mal interessant. Dafuer muesste man
die Daten ja mit Verkehrsprofilen anreichen - also peak/offpeak zeiten oder
aehnliches. Dafuer mueste man so in meiner kleinen Gedankenwelt ja
Verkehrsmessungen veranstalten d.h. wieviele Autos kommen in welcher
Am 16. April 2011 21:50 schrieb o...@tappenbeck.net o...@tappenbeck.net:
Weiß einer von Euch eine Karte die man mit der entsprechenden Darstellung
gut und für größeren Bereich ausdrucken kann ?
Den no-name layer auf osm.org kennst Du? Evtl. kannst Du das mit
bigmap.cgi oder so ausdrucken?
Am 18.04.11 schrieb Florian Lohoff:
Ich habe den Lizenzbedingungen wiedersprochen - dennoch wird alles
Blau gezeigt ...
gestern 20:00 noch nicht. Ich muss mal die expire-Strategie
überdenken/überarbeiten.
Viele Gruesse,
Fabian.
--
Institut für Informatik
Universität Leipzig
Hallo,
ich habe auf
http://fred.dev.openstreetmap.org/
ein kleines Skript gebastelt, das erstens einen Balken anzeigt, an dem
man sehen kann, wie viele Leute seit dem Wochenende auf agree bzw. auf
disagree geklickt haben, und das zweitens zeigt, *wer* alles auf
disagree geklickt hat.
Am 18.04.11 schrieb Florian Lohoff:
Ich habe den Lizenzbedingungen wiedersprochen - dennoch wird alles
Blau gezeigt ...
es liegt doch nicht am expire. Heute nacht haben sich 5% der Wege
geändert, das Importskript läuft noch. Wenn Du runterscrollst, siehst Du
das Datum der Lizenzdaten (wie
Am 18.04.2011 10:46, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
ein kleines Skript gebastelt, das erstens einen Balken anzeigt, an dem
man sehen kann, wie viele Leute seit dem Wochenende auf agree bzw. auf
disagree geklickt haben, und das zweitens zeigt, *wer* alles auf
disagree geklickt hat.
Wieso geht es
Am 18.04.2011 11:27, schrieb Doru Julian Bugariu:
Wieso geht es irgendwem an,*wer* auf disagree klickt?
wieso denn nicht? Stehst Du nicht zu Deiner Meinung?
Man kann die Sachen der disagree-Mapper schon mal neu erfassen, ich find
das gut.
Martin
Am 18.04.2011 11:32, schrieb Martin Czarkowski:
wieso denn nicht? Stehst Du nicht zu Deiner Meinung?
Man kann die Sachen der disagree-Mapper schon mal neu erfassen, ich find
das gut.
Dass nur die Disagreeer aber nicht die Agreeer aufgelistet werden ist
schon ein bisschen unglücklich, finde
2011/4/16 Heiko Jacobs heiko.jac...@gmx.de:
Am 16.04.2011 18:11, schrieb Felix Hartmann:
Das mag so beschrieben sein, hat aber mit Openstreetmap usage wenig zu
tun. Wenn das so sein soll, dann sollte hier auch geschrieben werden dass es
nur um Gesetzliche Regeln
+1
Bei usage=main ist die
Hallo,
On 04/18/2011 11:39 AM, Chris66 wrote:
Dass nur die Disagreeer aber nicht die Agreeer aufgelistet werden ist
schon ein bisschen unglücklich, finde ich auch.
Beide Listen sind oeffentlich:
http://planet.openstreetmap.org/users_agreed/users_disagreed.txt
So etwas statisch zu machen ist zu ungenau. Bspw. ist auf der
Hauptstraße eine Baustelle, quält sich alles durch die engere Umleitung
und schon ist das statische Modell hinfällig.
Weiterhin tritt dann das Problem auf, dass du durch das Routing für eine
Umverteilung sorgst.. Bsp. 2 parallele
Am 17. April 2011 17:19 schrieb fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
Zu solchen Relation gilt im Übrigen das Gleiche wie zu den ICE-Relation.
Kann man die nicht nach Ländern oder sogar in noch kleine Teile Gruppieren ?
Wenn eine Bundestraße oder Autobahn die ganze Zeit auch Europastraße
ist, kann
Am 18.04.2011 11:39, schrieb Chris66:
Dass nur die Disagreeer aber nicht die Agreeer aufgelistet werden ist
schon ein bisschen unglücklich, finde ich auch.
Andersrum gehts aber nicht (also die grünen zu überzeugen) und auch an
den Daten muss nichts neu erfasst werden, weil die ja unter CC-BY-SA
1 - 100 von 258 matches
Mail list logo
