On 20/12/2020 18:44, ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB wrote:
What you do is give the outline way "buildong=terrace" and
"name=" and all the houses with
"building:part=house". The software can then tell that all those
houses are part of the terrace called
This is a good solution. I usually
On 20/12/2020 16:09, Chris Hill wrote
Using the two separate towns is not correct. The house (or whatever)
is not in Largertown,it is in Smalltown.
By convention addr:* tags are for addressing, not for mapping
administrative boundaries. For the latter we can use is_in tags,
although explicit
On 20/12/2020 12:45, Dave Abbott wrote:
There is a page at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Rjw62/UK_Address_Mapping
which mentions "suggested tags" but there is no evidence that this is
in use. If correct I would be tagging as -
addr:housenumber=99
addr:street=Postal Street
Sorry for adding to the noise but this is important. Quote from the
document:
Changes to form part of OSMFs agenda over the coming 1-2 years:
1.
Make Working Groups and OSM activities more equitable: the
Diversity and Inclusion special committee should actively work
JOSM preset is:
highway=path
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
segregated=no
I quite like it as it doesn't imply one use is preferred to another.
On 21/11/2020 10:28, Edward Bainton wrote:
Is there established tagging for a tarmac path that is ~1.5m wide, but
designated foot and cycles
Hi Rob,
Good stuff, it's definitely worthwhile. Thinner lines could work better
(for me 1px would be perfect), especially that the max zoom stops at 17.
You could perhaps consider increasing the max zoom a notch as well.
Are the numbers in wms tiles UPRNs? If so, you could consider
d. IMHO it's a
good mini project for starting your journey with osm.
I would go a step further though:
"If no valid scheme is found, do nothing" - that's OK, but as the next
step please could you *manually* verify these links and either fix them
or a
On 02/07/2020 17:38, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
I'm not completely sure if/how we can best make use of the new OS
OpenData (UPRNs, USRNs and related links) in OpenStreetMap, but as a
first step I've set up a quick slippy map with the UPRN locations
shown:
Hi Jez,
I am not a fan of using entrances for tagging POIs for three reasons:
- An entrance to a shop is not a shop.
- Multiple primary tags cause problems with consuming data (e.g. when
rendering). Is the point mainly an entrance or mainly a shop? In
practice, we leave this decision to a
t's
what most people see first before examining the changeset in osmcha or
similar tools.
Ndrw
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
and listen to more experienced
mappers.
More guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Armchair_mapping
Ndrw
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
to change _that_.
Ndrw
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
12 matches
Mail list logo
