Ok, it seems my conversion script is now producing sane results so it's time
to work out what the final output should look like.
The first question that I think we need to answer is, how do we represent
the
data in OSM, there appears to be 3 options:-
1. Closed ways
2. Relations
3.
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:09:15 +1100
Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, it seems my conversion script is now producing sane results so
it's time to work out what the final output should look like.
The first question that I think we need to answer is, how do we
represent the
data
Hi hi,
Firstly, having suburb boundaries will allow OSM to be even closer to a UBD
replacement :).
Anyway, my vote would go for relations. Yes, they're tricky and a lot of people
don't understand them but given the current OSM data model they're the right
choice. My main argument for
Franc Carter franc.car...@... writes:
Ok, it seems my conversion script is now producing sane results so it's time
to work out what the final output should look like.
The first question that I think we need to answer is, how do we represent the
data in OSM, there appears to be 3 options:-
4 matches
Mail list logo
