Having seen that many are annoyed with this location showing up (I agree) and
having read the wikipedia article on it.
I've changed the place=country to place=state as it is a territory governed by
Australia this more accurately describes the status.
This should also mean it will not show up
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 23:37 +1000, Nick Hocking wrote:
Apart from Victoria and Albert does anyone know of an example
where
A Husband and Wife have both had roads named after them and that these
roads intersect.
At the risk of seeming obvious, a more modern example: Elizabeth Way
--- On Tue, 4/8/09, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Having seen that many are annoyed
with this location showing up (I agree) and having read the
wikipedia article on it.
I've changed the place=country to place=state as it is a
territory governed by Australia this more accurately
I've shrunk the shields to about half size, but now the text is becoming
unreadable.
Anyone able to make suggestions on shield/text size etc?
http://maps.bigtincan.com/?zoom=11lat=-33.86947lon=151.05768layers=B0
___
Talk-au mailing list
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, John Smith wrote:
--- On Tue, 4/8/09, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
http://www.ozroads.com.au/NSW/Freeways/M5/01.jpg
404
01.JPG
just navigate to the directory
and you get a listing
i picked the first one
--
BOFH excuse #257:
That would be because the software doesn't
I came up with this with a little bit of nudging from Liz in the right
direction:
http://maps.bigtincan.com/?zoom=11lat=-33.86931lon=151.04979layers=B0
Also I didn't know Goulburn had a metro road system...
http://maps.bigtincan.com/?zoom=12lat=-34.72133lon=149.7431layers=B0
I'm still trying
Someone has marked in a lot of roads, I assume from sat imagery, however they
marked them all as highway=service.
Also someone only half did the New England highway, I'm fixing it up still,
again probably from low res sat imagery, even though they list the source as
survey it doesn't look it.
--- On Tue, 4/8/09, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been to different countries too, e.g. to Africa, and
I don't
think the road systems are all the same. I know that there
is big
differences. But this doesn't explain why routing shouldn't
work as
long as you
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:53 AM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
Anyone have any objection to highway=rural?
Depends how you define it. If it's verifiable and exists only to
describe the way, there's no objection from me.
___
Talk-au mailing
--- On Tue, 4/8/09, b.schulz...@scu.edu.au b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:
highway=rural seems a logical choice.
Perhaps just work out a semi-rigid definition, such as:
Any road which is:
a) Primarily boarded by land used for primary production
and
b) Exists primarily to provide
--- On Tue, 4/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Depends how you define it. If it's verifiable and exists
only to
describe the way, there's no objection from me.
It would essentially replace the meanings on this page for unclassified and
unclassified would then be used as the
--- On Tue, 4/8/09, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
This road would be tagged residential or unclassified if
it was in a metropolitan or urban centre
When rendered should be the same as unclassified and
residential.
I wouldn't reference another highway class, but instead I'd more
--- On Tue, 4/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't like that.
1) are you really suggesting using highway=rural for Other
streets.
Not generally through routes.?
No, perhaps that was a bad example as I wasn't explicit.
I would do this:
No administrative
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:59 PM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
[ highway=rural means ] No administrative classification. Rural roads
typically form the lowest form of the non-Urban interconnecting grid network.
Anything non-connecting would be almost a service road?
Sounds ok. But
Never been further West than Parkes, I'm afraid.
I guess this comes down to tagging what exists vs tagging intended use. For
instance there are parts of the Pacific Highway which are 2 lanes but are
tagged as trunk because they're the Pacific Highway and are therefore the most
major road in
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:25 PM, b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:
I guess this comes down to tagging what exists vs tagging intended use. For
instance there are parts of the Pacific Highway which are 2 lanes but are
tagged as trunk because they're the Pacific Highway and are therefore the
most
--- On Tue, 4/8/09, b.schulz...@scu.edu.au b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:
The situation you're describing of a major thoroughfare
which is just a gravel road should probably be tagged as
unsealed primary while roads of similar
construction which exist so that farmers can get
home could come
--- On Tue, 4/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds ok. But you would need to define urban.
from dictionary.com:
urâ‹…ban [ur-buhn] Show IPA
Use urban in a Sentence
1. of, pertaining to, or designating a city or town.
2. living in a city.
3. characteristic of
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 1:48 PM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
Although the intended use is the first, urban=town/city, I very much doubt
that there would be enough roads in anything smaller than a town to need a
higher capacity version of a residential road.
Ok with me.
Someone
--- On Wed, 5/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok. Clear enough. In other words, unclassified = quartary
and below.
If this goes ahead I look forward to the wiki pages being
cleaned up
accordingly... :)
I'd update it now but that's bound to upset someone somewhere. I guess
While I don't feel it would be wise to alter the current wiki pages I made a
proposal to try and sort it out indirectly.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway:rural
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Brisbane mappers (and other interested parties),
I have arranged another OpenStreetMap meetup for Friday 21 August at
Southbank after work. Come and meet OpenStreetMappers and maybe do a
little micro-mapping of Southbank if you're up to it. The venue is
currently TBA, but will probably be a
22 matches
Mail list logo
