On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:07:48 +1100
David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 00:04 +, David Groom wrote:
I just want to draw attention to the survey at
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/WFVK6XS
, the link was mentionedn Richard Weait's email to this list on 1
Feb,
On 16 February 2011 07:07, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 00:04 +, David Groom wrote:
I just want to draw attention to the survey at
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/WFVK6XS
, the link was mentionedn Richard Weait's email to this list on 1 Feb, but I
have to
Hi, I've found something odd with Nominatim search in Qld. If you
search for Brighton, Queensland on osm.org , open.mapquest.com.au or
by using this link:
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/search?q=brighton+queenslandformat=xml
the display result is:
Brighton, 4017, Cape Moreton, Queensland,
Saw a couple of roads signed unsuitable for caravans which seems
like council butt covering but I'm not sure how to tag it since it's a
sign to discourage rather than to disallow.
--
Sent from my mobile device
___
Talk-au mailing list
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:58 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Saw a couple of roads signed unsuitable for caravans which seems
like council butt covering but I'm not sure how to tag it since it's a
sign to discourage rather than to disallow.
IMHO, the poor sap who plans his
On 17/02/11 12:58, John Smith wrote:
Saw a couple of roads signed unsuitable for caravans which seems
like council butt covering but I'm not sure how to tag it since it's a
sign to discourage rather than to disallow.
I've got at least one to tag also. Maybe
access:caravan=unsuitable
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 14:50 +1100, John Henderson wrote:
On 17/02/11 12:58, John Smith wrote:
Saw a couple of roads signed unsuitable for caravans which seems
like council butt covering but I'm not sure how to tag it since it's a
sign to discourage rather than to disallow.
I've got at
On 17/02/11 16:12, David Murn wrote:
Presumably if its unsuitable for caravans, its also unsuitable for HGV?
Maybe simply re-use the HGV access tags already in place?
I think they should be kept separate - there'll likely be places where
caravans are permitted (encouraged even), but HGVs not
Make a new specific tag (unsuitable_for_caravans=yes;
source:unsuitable_for_caravans=survey), and document it on the wiki (with a
photo of a sign). At least that's explicit and clear.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:58 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
Saw a couple of roads signed
On 17 February 2011 15:52, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
On 17/02/11 16:12, David Murn wrote:
Presumably if its unsuitable for caravans, its also unsuitable for HGV?
Maybe simply re-use the HGV access tags already in place?
I think they should be kept separate - there'll likely be
10 matches
Mail list logo
