Here is a suggestion:
Whenever a situation like this comes up (i.e. posted signage which does
not fit neatly in a predetermined/official tag case), why not introduce
a new tag:
signposted: Literal text from sign
...on the basis such a thing cannot be questioned, because that is what
is
On 17/02/11 20:16, {withheld} wrote:
Here is a suggestion:
Whenever a situation like this comes up (i.e. posted signage which does
not fit neatly in a predetermined/official tag case), why not introduce
a new tag:
signposted: Literal text from sign
...on the basis such a thing cannot
I've been tagging these with caravan=no where I've found them.
I'd suggest caravan=no if not at all and caravan=unsuitable if it's only
signposted as not suitable.
This is in keeping with the other tags like 4wd_only=yes/no/recommended.
I'd also suggest adding the signposted= or
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 08:02 +0100, waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Make a new specific tag (unsuitable_for_caravans=yes;
source:unsuitable_for_caravans=survey), and document it on the wiki
(with a photo of a sign). At least that's explicit and clear.
I see the problem with my HGV proposal. On my
I agree with the access suggestion, eg
access:caravan=yes/no/designated/unsuitable
I now regret using 4wd_only, this should have be an access: tag
instead, eg access:4wd=only/yes/no etc
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 11:43 +1000, John Smith wrote:
I agree with the access suggestion, eg
access:caravan=yes/no/designated/unsuitable
I now regret using 4wd_only, this should have be an access: tag
instead, eg access:4wd=only/yes/no etc
This should be quite easy to script a change for, as
6 matches
Mail list logo
