Re: [talk-au] Unsuitable for caravans

2011-02-18 Thread John Smith
On 18 February 2011 18:04, waldo000...@gmail.com waldo000...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:43 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: I agree with the access suggestion, eg access:caravan=yes/no/designated/unsuitable You mean caravan=*, right? This is already listed at

Re: [talk-au] Unsuitable for caravans

2011-02-18 Thread Steve Bennett
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:25 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: Nope I meant what I said, access:caravan=* same with access:4wd=* As I understand it, foot, motorcar, bicycle, hgv etc are all considered subtags of the access tag. So, for consistency, it would be caravan=no, just like

[talk-au] temp name change

2011-02-18 Thread Elizabeth Dodd
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/02/18/3142067.htm anyone fixing this on the map? ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Unsuitable for caravans

2011-02-18 Thread John Smith
On 18 February 2011 18:56, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:25 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: Nope I meant what I said, access:caravan=* same with access:4wd=* As I understand it, foot, motorcar, bicycle, hgv etc are all considered subtags of

Re: [talk-au] Unsuitable for caravans

2011-02-18 Thread Steve Bennett
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:14 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: I dont think basing a decision on those previous tags is a good idea. It's documented and everything. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access I can't see any basis for doing this one differently. But why don't

Re: [talk-au] temp name change

2011-02-18 Thread Steve Bennett
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/02/18/3142067.htm anyone fixing this on the map? http://osm.org/go/uHNkkz1O-- Steve ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org

Re: [talk-au] Unsuitable for caravans

2011-02-18 Thread John Smith
On 18 February 2011 19:28, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:14 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: I dont think basing a decision on those previous tags is a good idea. It's documented and everything. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

Re: [talk-au] Unsuitable for caravans

2011-02-18 Thread Elizabeth Dodd
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:56:03 +1100 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:25 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: Nope I meant what I said, access:caravan=* same with access:4wd=* As I understand it, foot, motorcar, bicycle, hgv etc are all

Re: [talk-au] Unsuitable for caravans

2011-02-18 Thread Steve Bennett
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote: will the caravan=no belong on the cycleway or will it belong on the main way? Heh. Ever heard of a bike path that permitted caravans? This discussion just informs us that the access tagging system has faults. Discuss

Re: [talk-au] temp name change

2011-02-18 Thread Steve Bennett
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 9:17 AM, {withheld} pheasant.cou...@gmail.com wrote: Please note the last line of that article: Both the town and Phil Down will revert to their original names in a month. Why bother? Because it's fun. Steve ___ Talk-au

Re: [talk-au] temp name change

2011-02-18 Thread David Murn
On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 10:36 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote: On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 9:17 AM, {withheld} pheasant.cou...@gmail.com wrote: Please note the last line of that article: Both the town and Phil Down will revert to their original names in a month. Why bother? Because it's fun. The