On 18 February 2011 18:04, waldo000...@gmail.com waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:43 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with the access suggestion, eg
access:caravan=yes/no/designated/unsuitable
You mean caravan=*, right? This is already listed at
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:25 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope I meant what I said, access:caravan=* same with access:4wd=*
As I understand it, foot, motorcar, bicycle, hgv etc are all
considered subtags of the access tag. So, for consistency, it would be
caravan=no, just like
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/02/18/3142067.htm
anyone fixing this on the map?
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 18 February 2011 18:56, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:25 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope I meant what I said, access:caravan=* same with access:4wd=*
As I understand it, foot, motorcar, bicycle, hgv etc are all
considered subtags of
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:14 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I dont think basing a decision on those previous tags is a good idea.
It's documented and everything.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
I can't see any basis for doing this one differently. But why don't
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/02/18/3142067.htm
anyone fixing this on the map?
http://osm.org/go/uHNkkz1O--
Steve
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
On 18 February 2011 19:28, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:14 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I dont think basing a decision on those previous tags is a good idea.
It's documented and everything.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:56:03 +1100
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:25 PM, John Smith
deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope I meant what I said, access:caravan=* same with access:4wd=*
As I understand it, foot, motorcar, bicycle, hgv etc are all
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
will the caravan=no belong on the cycleway or will it belong on the
main way?
Heh. Ever heard of a bike path that permitted caravans?
This discussion just informs us that the access tagging system has
faults.
Discuss
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 9:17 AM, {withheld} pheasant.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
Please note the last line of that article: Both the town and Phil Down
will revert to their original names in a month.
Why bother?
Because it's fun.
Steve
___
Talk-au
On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 10:36 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 9:17 AM, {withheld} pheasant.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
Please note the last line of that article: Both the town and Phil Down
will revert to their original names in a month.
Why bother?
Because it's fun.
The
11 matches
Mail list logo