On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:49 AM, 4x4falcon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
On 24/04/11 19:54, John Smith wrote:
Once upon a time it used to be almost a race to map out new areas from
Nearmap coverage, now whole areas of coverage go untouched for months
or longer...
Even from bing there is not
Hi Franc,
I had a look and Navit doesn't have natural=bay as a supported tag even
though it is a supported tag in OSM.
It might be worth contacting the developers of Navit and ask them to include
the tag natural=bay from a relation to render as water.
Regards,
Markus
-Original
On 25 April 2011 09:41, Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir maxi...@gmail.com
wrote:
fosm.org looks pretty good with potlatch2. Just need a tile server or
to setup my own again - how does one get a big fat planet.osm?
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:11:29 +0100
Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
FOSM.org is hosted on a virtual machine of hypercube provided for
XAPI. Without any explanation I was banned from the FOSM when I stated
this.
Regards
Grant
OSM Sysadmin team.
Banned from the
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I remember there was a discussion a while ago tagging of bays - which
I didn;t pay much attention too ;-(
They now seem to be in a relation for each Bay, which is nice for
defining the area of the bay. However
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 11:33 +0100, 80n wrote:
There's no tileserver yet, that's a priority, there's no gratification
if things are rendered.
Is it possible to setup some sort of tiles@home-like system for fosm?
That could be a way to reduce your load.
David
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/04/26/china_street_view_licences/
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
[snip]
I've been aiming to tag bays as areas rather than just a node in the
centre. As a consequence my initial thought was to tag the area as
natural=bay. Traditionally most renderers didn't render this as water.
the OSM Mapnik style now does, but many others still don't. The
problem was I
I was wondering this question tonight.
How many OSM users have accepted the new terms, without fully
understanding that sources they have used in the past prohibit them from
doing so.
So, I wrote a little script to find out and the numbers are surprising.
Using my australian test extract from
Hi Talk-au,
I am a volunteer member (like all the members) of the Licensing
Working Group (LWG), OSM Sysadmin Team along with a few other
OpenStreetMap groups.
The LWG is well aware of the NearMap licensing issue and we are trying
to get it resolved as soon as we can but we are an all volunteer
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
I was wondering this question tonight.
[ ... ]
This only shows where there is clear evidence of licence violations
without having to look past the data's tags.
[ ... ]
Food for thought
Junk food at best. ;-) OSM
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 15:17 +0100, Grant Slater wrote:
I am a volunteer member (like all the members) of the Licensing
Working Group (LWG), OSM Sysadmin Team along with a few other
OpenStreetMap groups.
Does this mean we can ask (and receive definitive answers from) you the
hard questions
- Original Message -
From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
To: OSM Australian Talk List talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] How many NearMap users do you think have accepted the
new CTs and ODbL?
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM,
Hi.
On 27 April 2011 00:56, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 15:17 +0100, Grant Slater wrote:
Unfortunately there are some very vocal (anonymous) members of the
Australian community who seem intent on creating a virtual Us vs
Them conflict in the community
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:17:33 +0100
Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
Unfortunately there are some very vocal (anonymous) members of the
Australian community who seem intent on creating a virtual Us vs
Them conflict in the community with exaggerated claims and mistruths.
We
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:24:09 +1000
David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Using my australian test extract from 21/03/2011, I found that 3390
users have made edits in the area of interest (the Australian extract
available on osmaustralia.org).
Of these 3390 users, 536 have used the tag
On 26 April 2011 22:06, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
Bluntly,
CC-by-SA for geodata is fine here. It's good enough for our government,
it's good enough for us. (Au government now is using CC-by for data).
We believe in Share-Alike. Actually, we have been brought up to believe
in
It asks you to agree. It doesn't ask you to accept or decline as you
wish - and doesn't say what will happen if you decline.
Contributor terms
Please read the agreement below and press the agree button to confirm
that you accept the terms of this agreement for your existing and
future
On 27 April 2011 04:15, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
But I thought that Nearmap has said that they did not think the CT's were
compatible with the use of their data. As I understood it this had nothing
to do with CC-BY-SA or ODbL.
So the issue as I understand it is the CT's,
On 27 April 2011 07:06, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
Bluntly,
CC-by-SA for geodata is fine here. It's good enough for our government,
it's good enough for us. (Au government now is using CC-by for data).
We believe in Share-Alike. Actually, we have been brought up to believe
in
On 27/04/11 07:06, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:17:33 +0100
Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
Unfortunately there are some very vocal (anonymous) members of the
Australian community who seem intent on creating a virtual Us vs
Them conflict in the community with
21 matches
Mail list logo
