Re: [talk-au] nodes of a business placed on a road

2017-05-26 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
The bit that worries me about these 3 listings is that the addresses that can be found by searching, don't match up with the locations shown Thanks Graeme On 27 May 2017 at 11:08, wrote: > Hi > > I have deleted these in the past, eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/ >

Re: [talk-au] nodes of a business placed on a road

2017-05-26 Thread forster
Hi I have deleted these in the past, eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47218168 I believe that they should be deleted on the principle of Verifiability http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability "OSM data should, as far as is reasonably possible, be verifiable ... a

Re: [talk-au] nodes of a business placed on a road

2017-05-26 Thread Warin
On 26-May-17 07:34 PM, nwastra wrote: These edits are just nodes of a business placed on a road without a physical building coincidentally mapped. Is this allowed? This is OSM... 'everything is allowed'. :P However .. not good practice. Firstly the business node should ideally be off to the

[talk-au] nodes of a business placed on a road

2017-05-26 Thread nwastra
These edits are just nodes of a business placed on a road without a physical building coincidentally mapped. Is this allowed? Does a business need to have a physical building presence to be included in OSM? If these nodes were placed near the road instead would that be ok? *Corrected link:*

[talk-au] nodes of a business placed on a road

2017-05-26 Thread nwastra
These edits are just nodes of a business placed on a road without a physical building coincidentally mapped. Is this allowed? Does a business need to have a physical building presence to be included in OSM? If these nodes were placed near the road instead would that be ok?