On 27 November 2010 19:08, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
You can of course fork whatever you like, but allow me to point out that
(1) if you are unhappy with the slippy map plugin, why not fork that
Does this mean talks with Nearmap has failed to come to an amicable arrangement?
before:
http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/editors/josm/plugins/slippymap/src/org/openstreetmap/josm/plugins/slippymap/SlippyMapPreferences.java?p=24300
after:
On 26 November 2010 20:18, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I can tell, we are still talking with Nearmap to find a compromise
acceptable to both party. The last email I exchanged with Ben Last was last
night. I don't think we are near a breakdown in communication at
On 25 November 2010 12:57, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
landuse, and at a stretch, bike paths etc. I guess John Smith will be
mapping out the boundaries of the coverage? Should be interesting.
There is no news here until they actually allow it, so far they are
claiming they can't
On 25 November 2010 13:20, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
On 25 November 2010 03:00, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 November 2010 12:57, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
landuse, and at a stretch, bike paths etc. I guess John Smith will be
mapping
On 24 November 2010 07:36, Christoph Donges cdon...@gmail.com wrote:
In a park there is a set of rails and small trains that pull 2 or 3
carriages that people can sit on.
Here are some photos:
http://amynaomi.blogspot.com/2010/03/trains.html
I have tagged it as railway=narrow_gauge but I
On 24 November 2010 13:54, Christoph Donges cdon...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. I couldn't find that.
It needs to be added to the railway section of map features, but for
what ever reason it was overlooked previously...
___
Talk-au mailing list
-- Forwarded message --
From: Fabian Schmidt fschm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de
Date: 12 November 2010 02:41
Subject: [OSM-talk] license change map
To: t...@openstreetmap.org
As the license thermometer[1] turns greener I was interested in how
far this already effects the map
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au
Date: 12 November 2010 11:37
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] license change map
To: Fabian Schmidt fschm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de
Cc: t...@openstreetmap.org
From looking at a few different cities in this map, it is
On 8 November 2010 22:57, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
Or put them in road tunnels like Sydney's M5, so that visitors like me using
OSM get told about the correct exit inside the tunnel instead of being told
we've missed the turn when we eventually exit.
This sort of thing is being
On 9 November 2010 15:40, ed...@billiau.net wrote:
As far as my reading got, this could work with a smart phone, as the
additional signals were broadcast on 2.4GHz, but not on a consumer GPS.
Is this the something like wifi triangulation, which a number of
companies (eg skyhook, google, apple,
Stephen Von Worley has some fun reversing the distortions of the
Mercator projection, which exaggerates the size of things at the poles
in order to achieve consistent compass bearings. He imagines what
would happen if Greenland was on the equator and Africa in the Arctic,
and goes on to do the
On 5 November 2010 00:26, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
A parking area may have lit/unlit parts, and most of these areas are too
large to simply tag the whole area as lit/unlit. Ive had a look through
You could have 2 parking areas and mark one as lit and one that isn't...
One
On 5 November 2010 10:54, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
The two parking areas issue is the same issue as needing to split a highway in
order to tag different segments with different maxspeeds. For example if we
have
(best read with a monospaced font),
Most either can't do
On 5 November 2010 11:33, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
Like putting a way down the middle of each lane and then tieing that
back to the road, or like just adding a lane:n:feature = value to the
existing road way? Then you could do something like lane:0:restriction
=
Has any progress been made on this front at all?
I noticed in the latest minutes[1] that the LWG has no plans to
address the section(s) that Nearmap objected to, and previous
minutes[2] didn't show any resolution either.
[1] https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_87d3bmhxgc
[2]
On 10 October 2010 16:57, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
An OSM file like the osmChange ... ones (eg.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/0123/download), or the
osm ... one that JOSM can save new edits as when you go FileSave As?
As JOSM spits out, that way the
On 10 October 2010 17:25, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you tell the changes from the things that haven't changed when
viewing this in JOSM though?
You load a new layer from the DB and can compare the 2...
___
Talk-au mailing
The world's biggest book fair in Frankfurt is used to seeing some big
book launches, but none came larger than a six-by-nine-foot (1.82 by
2.74 metres) atlas unveiled on Wednesday.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/10/06/3031388.htm
___
Talk-au
You need to dial a helicopter to get you off the mountain
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1315762/White-van-man-airlifted-safety-satnav-sends-mountain.html
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
On 30 September 2010 11:58, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
A pretty similar thing happened to a friend of mine. Hired a car
overseas, set off for a drive in the country, and ended up on a
walking track that kept on getting narrower and narrower... Minus the
helicopter rescue though.
It doesn't seem likely things are going to be resolved to everyone's
liking, in fact there seems to be a new type of service popping up
every other week.
So to this end I just filed a bug with JOSM asking to get multiple
credentials stored and some easy way to switch between them. This is
so you
On 22 September 2010 14:16, Andrew Laughton laughton.and...@gmail.com wrote:
To me this means multiple username and password combinations, all with
the same OSM site.
I think you should spell out that we need JOSM to be able to be used
on different mapping sites.
It would also be useful for
On 22 September 2010 14:30, Andrew Laughton laughton.and...@gmail.com wrote:
http://fosm.org give instructions on how to change JOSM so that it uses FOSM.
Yes, but you loose any authentication information for OSM and vice
versa if you switch between them, that is unless you run JOSM under
On 16 September 2010 18:35, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
Point 4 of the Contributor Terms provides a guaranteed mechanism for
Attribution.
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms
On 16 September 2010 00:37, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
I believe John Smith initially suggested it to NearMap. Ben Last at NearMap
No, I posted the question publicly to the legal talk list, my concern
wasn't just about Nearmap but any source that may be too easy to
access
On 16 September 2010 00:37, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Nestoria have launched an OSM option in Australia.
http://blog.nestoria.com.au/big-thank-you
Wonder if they'll ditch OSM when the data is reverted due to the poor
quality previously available...
On 16 September 2010 04:02, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
That said, there is no answer right now for what will happen regarding
NearMap imagery in the future. Currently, OSM users may not use
NearMap imagery for deriving data for OSM.
Only users that have agreed with the new
On 16 September 2010 04:12, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
bad. This isn't a competition with a winner and loser. The fact is
that NearMap don't want OSM users using their imagery right now. So
we shouldn't.
This isn't true, they don't want to allow their data to be submitted
under
On 16 September 2010 07:31, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
I don't think that your recommendation is in the best interest of
OpenStreetMap or OSM contributors.
You left off 3, there is going to be a fork as cc-by-sa and any such
contributions from Nearmap will be happily accepted.
Also
On 16 September 2010 07:31, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
I don't think that your recommendation is in the best interest of
OpenStreetMap or OSM contributors.
Actually how can you or anyone else make this statement in good faith
when most of the contributors have never been asked what
On 16 September 2010 07:58, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Or did you mean CommonMap?
http://commonmap.info
Unlikely, since CommonMap is cc-by, not cc-by-sa...
Or did you mean SharedMap?
http://www.sharedmap.org
At this stage this is run and used by a single person, perhaps this
On 16 September 2010 08:11, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
This old saw again, JohnSmith? Every time the community is asked,
they support progress in the form of ODbL rather than the
inappropriate CC-By-SA. Here is the latest feedback for you.
Yes and how many said they haven't even
On 16 September 2010 08:15, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
It will take forever if you never start the discussion. ;-)
I was under the impression the LWG was already talking to Nearmap,
however I don't have a problem with the current license, so I don't
see a point in wasting it to
On 31 August 2010 17:30, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Ross Scanlon wrote:
Sarcasm switch firmly on.
:D
Can anyone explain why aussie humour isn't understood in most other
parts of the world?
___
Talk-au mailing list
On 31 August 2010 19:11, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
In the case of Campbell Primary School it only renders one name at even
the highest zoom level.
I'm seeing two names at the highest zoom level.
URL?
On 31 August 2010 19:16, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:14 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
URL?
http://c.tile.openstreetmap.org/18/239684/158567.png
I was after the perm link
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-35.290188lon
On 31 August 2010 19:28, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
This is exactly what I did, but Ross said this is not correct (barring
the one or two source tags I incorrectly copied across that I offered
to fix).
There may be a miscommunication, but you definitely don't need/nor
should
On 31 August 2010 19:41, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Additionally just don't delete 300 or so nodes without seeing if it's by
general agreement rather than just announcing that you've done it.
Not that you'd do anything like that, John :)
Actually that's probably one of the few
On 31 August 2010 20:00, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok sorry, in future I'll make announcements here. I just didn't want
to spam the list and I knew it could be reverted anyway.
The longer you leave things to do a revert, the more problematic it
will be, best to discuss
This might be more suitable for Lake Eyre etc...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/41007651
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bégin, Daniel daniel.be...@rncan-nrcan.gc.ca
Date: 27 August 2010 06:29
Subject: [Tagging] Intermittent water
To: tagg...@openstreetmap.org
Cc:
Just thought I'd give people a heads up if they're looking for a good
deal on mobile broadband, currently Vodafone are offering 1.5G/mo for
$15 on a month to month post pay account and Crazy Johns are offering
2G/mo for $15 on a 6mth post pay account.
If you get a rootable android handset you can
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ross Johnson ros...@hotmail.com
Date: 25 August 2010 12:41
Subject: [Aust-NZ] interesting decision - UK row over publishing
public mapping data
To:
Public sector bodies in the UK will not be able to publish data on
Google Maps, despite a new deal
On 25 August 2010 14:40, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
John are you going to do this?
I'm stuck on 3G atm, I may not be able to get to it for a week or more
depending on what happens until I get access to a DSL connection
again.
___
Talk-au
-- Forwarded message --
From: Shoaib Burq sab...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:37:42 +1000
Subject: [Aust-NZ] CrisisCamp Pakistan Floods, Sydney (4-5 Sept)
To: Aust-NZ OSGeo aust...@lists.osgeo.org
Hi all,
Thought some of you maybe interested in coming along and helping out
On 20 August 2010 11:28, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
copyright-trap; if it showed up in an external database it'd be evidence of
copying.
It could also have been a gazetted road that was never built...
___
Talk-au mailing list
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ross Johnson ros...@hotmail.com
Date: 20 August 2010 13:14
Subject: [Aust-NZ] RE: ABS news
To: aust...@lists.osgeo.org
ABS to equip staff with wikis, blogs and community spaces
On 18 August 2010 05:50, mattwh...@iinet.net.au mattwh...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Is anybody in Brisvegas interested in running an OSM stand at linuxconf?
I've put in an application for a miniconf...
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Newish TV show, K-9, which seems to be a kids spin off from the K-9
dog that used to be on Doctor Who a couple of decades ago, in any case
a map flashed up and I instantly recognised it as OSM map tiles...
You can see the map on this youtube video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AggIfEp_7mw
On 16 August 2010 11:14, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Nice to see OSM data in use on TV.
firefishy says that the central London tiles shown predate 23 May 2010.
The wikipedia page says it was filmed 2008-2009
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-9_(TV_series)
On 14 August 2010 14:46, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
What would be the best way to get a publically accessable web map of the ACT
showing
the OSM data but with the bridges highlighted?
Also bridges that have not had their bridge_number tagged could be
highlighted in red
and
On 14 August 2010 17:50, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you asking about a custom mapnik style sheet?
Yes
Do you plan to host it locally on your own computer, or just want
someone else to do it all?
Why are you using bridge_number=* instead of ref=* or bridge:ref=* ?
My
On 12 August 2010 22:22, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
Sorry, my abuse reply was to the hypothetical question.
But the un-winding of edits still stands.
What about abusive edits that tweak the location of nodes by 0.1mm by
someone pro-CT/ODBL just so they can claim the node
On 14 August 2010 14:46, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
What would be the best way to get a publically accessable web map of the ACT
showing
the OSM data but with the bridges highlighted?
I assumed you meant the bridge casing...
On 14 August 2010 18:19, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
This sounds right to me. But if you propose bridge:ref=* then you
should probably also use bridge:name=* rather than the already
proposed bridge_name=*.
I still think it should be just name=*, after all what's the point of
the
On 15 August 2010 08:15, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Are you suggesting that such a bulk edit has happened? I'm not aware
of edits that match that description perhaps you can link to the
changesets for reference?
I'm not suggesting any such thing has happened, but if people are
Why are you cross posting this to the talk-au list, that seems to
indicate he's right...
On 13 August 2010 16:20, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
I love the implication here that you're 'poisonous' if you don't
On 12 August 2010 21:28, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
Have I got this right or am I worrying too much?
It's unclear what will happen at this point, since no one has the
chance to actually disagree any more, although there was a thread
about what to do about people that aren't
Nearmap as far as I know haven't agreed to the new Contributor Terms
(CTs) or the ODBL, so anyone that has traced anything from Nearmap
isn't able to agree to the new license, doing so would put you in
breach of contract with Nearmap which would also breach clause 1 on
the new Contributor Terms.
On 10 August 2010 19:47, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote:
Since I've heard nothing more about this I can only assume that any
consideration for a compromise has been rejected by the pro-PD crowd.
Why do you even assume this?
Grant pasted this from LWG minutes on IRC earlier
On 10 August 2010 07:54, 16 towal...@gmail.com wrote:
Just being evil-minded and petty; I wonder if this hint should be added
(discretely) to, say, the Australian Tagging Guidelines. Might as well
keep up the image of them ignorant Southern Hemisphere hicks wot
doesn't like to toe the line?
I
Since I've heard nothing more about this I can only assume that any
consideration for a compromise has been rejected by the pro-PD crowd.
On 30 July 2010 15:54, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 July 2010 15:40, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
I was going to just
On 10 August 2010 09:34, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Also, there are many mappers around, just because one or two people
didnt map an area, doesnt mean it wouldnt be mapped. If a mapper sees
an area filled in, they wont work so closely on that area, but if those
2 or 3 users you
For anyone still fence sitting over the new contributor terms and the
ODBL this is what you have to look forward to in the near future:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-August/003908.html
Basically those in favour of PD but not directly effected by or
benefiting from data
For those of you that dislike the new wiki look, you can revert it by going to:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Special:Preferences
Click on 'Appearance', and then select 'MonoBook' and save...
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Officials in Riverhead, New York are using Google Earth to root out
the owners of unlicensed pools. So far they've found 250 illegal pools
and collected $75,000 in fines and fees. Of course not everyone thinks
that a city should be spending time looking at aerial pictures of
backyards. from the
-- Forwarded message --
From: Simon Cropper scrop...@botanicusaustralia.com.au
Date: 3 August 2010 12:47
Subject: [Aust-NZ] Superficial review of copyright issues related to
collection and publication of education material on OSGeo Website
(LINK)
To: aust...@lists.osgeo.org
Hi
Just noticed a diary entry[1] pointing out that MS now uses a OSM
layer on their Bing Map site[2]
[1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Paul%20Johnson/diary/11407
[2]
http://www.bing.com/community/blogs/maps/archive/2010/08/02/bing-maps-adds-open-street-maps-layer.aspx
I'd love to know about
On 31 July 2010 10:36, James Livingston li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
Then it doesn't help at all - what if ODbL 1.1 says that you can freely
relicense to CC-Zero? And if you think that can't happen, go look at the GNU
Free Documentation Licence 1.3 and Wikipedia. That kind of legal hijinks
On 30 July 2010 16:16, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 3:54 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
If You have indicated to OSMF that you waive any rights in Your
Contents (dedication to the 'public domain'), OSMF will additionally
use or sub
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps#Queensland
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 30 July 2010 19:40, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote:
On a different topic of sourcing, as I mentionned some time ago, Spot Images
will be releasing images of France in the near future for a period of 6
months. The attribution is very important to them and that's why someone is
On 30 July 2010 20:24, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote:
Yup, hence the reason I mentioned it was about a different topic of
sourcing, and I couldn't find the previous thread.
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2010-July/006868.html
Mackay imagery seems to be online now as well:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps#Queensland
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Toowoomba imagery is now online as well...
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 29 July 2010 17:58, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
If a new user, who has agreed to the contributor terms, makes a contribution
that this derived from work that is *only* licensed under CC-BY-SA do they
have the right to allow that contribution to be licensed under ODbL. I
don't think they
On 29 July 2010 22:47, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
That was another question I meant to ask. Does one map in accordance
with the legal jurisdiction that the OSM servers are within, the
jurisdiction where the mapper is, or the jurisdiction of the area
being mapped?
You personally
On 29 July 2010 23:34, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
1) YOU have to ask Nearmap if they are OK with YOU using their imagery under
the terms of the CT
Which they aren't so...
2) you cant use Nearmap imagery for tracing, and you should ask for all your
edits where you have used
On 30 July 2010 15:40, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
I was going to just create a new account, and not agree to the CTs,
only to discover you cannot create an account without accepting. That
means that no new members can contribute by deriving information from
Nearmap
New dataset of the electoral boundaries just became available:
http://data.australia.gov.au/638
I'm not sure it's worth doing anything with these as they tend to
shift too frequently, although they could be imported without trying
to merge them into existing boundaries so they can be reimported
On 28 July 2010 18:01, James Andrewartha tr...@student.uwa.edu.au wrote:
Each state is done once every seven years, that doesn't seem overly
frequent to me.
After posting that I noticed that it was crown copyright, so we can't
do anything with it anyway...
Does anyone have a suitable picture of a SES station so it can be used
on the wiki?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features#Emergency
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 28 July 2010 23:05, Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.com wrote:
There's one just up the road from me, but my experience is that these are
brick buildings without much distinction.
Most of the ones I've seen are tin sheds, in any case it's just to
illustrate and for some reason the image of
On 29 July 2010 01:43, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
1) Change the tag to source=nearmap: that's misattributing any parts
of the way that you didn't update
2) Change the tag to source=yahoo;nearmap: tedious, but relatively accurate
3) Add source tags to the individual nodes that you
On 27 July 2010 21:07, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
If an existing way was marked as source:yahoo, but I made some minor
alterations from nearmap imagery what should I do to the source?
Should I leave it as source:yahoo and add source:nearmap to the
changeset? Or should I
On 27 July 2010 22:54, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
I'd be cautious about changing anything that is source=survey (gps or
otherwise) though to source=nearmap. I have done this in a couple of places
but it's thing's like a road being made dual carriage way when it was
originally a
On 28 July 2010 08:28, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, the only reason I was unsure is because if you only change part
of the way from nearmap imagery then you have part sourced from
nearmap, and part sourced from yahoo or survey.
In that case, while far from ideal, but
On 28 July 2010 13:39, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
Most streams I look at on OSM have been drawn uphill, and I've been
reversing the direction of ones I notice as wrong. Indeed, I find it more
natural to draw streams that way myself, and then reverse them.
Sometimes it's hard to
How do people tag over taking sections on highways where there is no
physical separation between oncoming traffic?
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 26 July 2010 20:56, James Livingston li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
On 26/07/2010, at 7:12 PM, John Smith wrote:
How do people tag over taking sections on highways where there is no
physical separation between oncoming traffic?
I've never tagged them before, but there is
http
On 26 July 2010 21:31, James Livingston li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
Either that or tag it as lanes=3 and somehow indicate which direction the
extra lane is in. As far as I recall, the rules for an overtaking lane
aren't any different to the right hand lanes of a two-each-way road when it's
Not a single reply to Liz's request, so either these are limited to
Australia or nobody else cares that much what the tag would be called,
either way I made a new wiki page for this and shifted the content
from the tagging guidelines page
On 26 July 2010 12:39, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 09:37 +1000, John Smith wrote:
Not a single reply to Liz's request, so either these are limited to
Australia or nobody else cares that much what the tag would be called,
Just a thought, but you do realise
Is now online:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps#Queensland
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 24 July 2010 15:58, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
I've tried cellardoor via google and not hit on any synonyms yet
'Tasting Room' comes back with quite a few hits, although cellar door
sounds better to me...
___
Talk-au mailing list
On 25 July 2010 09:25, Craig Feuerherdt craigfeuerhe...@gmail.com wrote:
Should we put some effort into defining a standard based on Australian
principles then post it on the tagging list? Easier to deal with a few
rather than many suggestions/interests...maybe ;)
Liz posted a question to the
On 23 July 2010 15:31, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:24:53 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
something else... Also I marked the RAAF taxiway etc as
access=military although access=private might be more accurate since
you can get permission
I don't think this kind of thing is Aussie specific and it would be
better off being on it's own web page and/or going through the tagging
list...
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 24 July 2010 15:28, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, John Smith wrote:
I don't think this kind of thing is Aussie specific and it would be
better off being on it's own web page and/or going through the tagging
list...
I have no idea about similar systems in other
On 22 July 2010 14:55, {Tim} m526244+osm...@gmail.com wrote:
I, obviously, agree. This situation (speed limits in either direction
bearing no relation to one another) is perhaps more common than you
realise. and upon further thought, apart from trivial cases why should
it not be so?
The
201 - 300 of 1775 matches
Mail list logo
