Just on this, can someone please explain why if I search 45 Wharf Street
Forster, the result I get back is 45, Wharf Street, Forster Keys,
Forster, 2428,
Australiahttp://www.openstreetmap.org/?minlon=152.50084899902minlat=-32.190236816406maxlon=152.52086425781maxlat=-32.170233001709
Where does
On 21/09/12 20:41, Leathal wrote:
Hi
I was just wondering what the tagging standard is for residential housing in
suburbs?
I can't find anything definitive, and most of the common methods such as
landuse=residential is set aside for large scale areas (which is correct IMO).
I ensure
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Leathal leatha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I was just wondering what the tagging standard is for residential housing in
suburbs?
I can't find anything definitive, and most of the common methods such as
landuse=residential is set aside for large scale areas (which
On 21 September 2012 20:41, Leathal leatha...@gmail.com wrote:
I just don't like this method of numbers only:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-19.295319lon=146.71811zoom=18layers=M
That's the way I do it. OSM is never going to become a cadastral map
just from tracing. The numbers are the
Hi,
For fast numbering, you might want to check out the technique I tried for Wharf
Street, Forster NSW.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-32.18045lon=152.51021zoom=17layers=M
This uses the address interpolation technique. I wasn't sure at the time if
I'd done it the right way because
5 matches
Mail list logo