Re: [talk-au] Blocks of land - residential housing

2012-09-22 Thread Ben Johnson
Just on this, can someone please explain why if I search 45 Wharf Street Forster, the result I get back is 45, Wharf Street, Forster Keys, Forster, 2428, Australiahttp://www.openstreetmap.org/?minlon=152.50084899902minlat=-32.190236816406maxlon=152.52086425781maxlat=-32.170233001709 Where does

Re: [talk-au] Blocks of land - residential housing

2012-09-22 Thread Andrew Harvey
On 21/09/12 20:41, Leathal wrote: Hi I was just wondering what the tagging standard is for residential housing in suburbs? I can't find anything definitive, and most of the common methods such as landuse=residential is set aside for large scale areas (which is correct IMO). I ensure

Re: [talk-au] Blocks of land - residential housing

2012-09-21 Thread Richard Weait
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Leathal leatha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I was just wondering what the tagging standard is for residential housing in suburbs? I can't find anything definitive, and most of the common methods such as landuse=residential is set aside for large scale areas (which

Re: [talk-au] Blocks of land - residential housing

2012-09-21 Thread Ian Sergeant
On 21 September 2012 20:41, Leathal leatha...@gmail.com wrote: I just don't like this method of numbers only: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-19.295319lon=146.71811zoom=18layers=M That's the way I do it. OSM is never going to become a cadastral map just from tracing. The numbers are the

Re: [talk-au] Blocks of land - residential housing

2012-09-21 Thread Ben Johnson
Hi, For fast numbering, you might want to check out the technique I tried for Wharf Street, Forster NSW. http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-32.18045lon=152.51021zoom=17layers=M This uses the address interpolation technique. I wasn't sure at the time if I'd done it the right way because