On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
On Wed, 26 May 2010 10:28:24 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 May 2010 10:23, Alex Lum sierra.os...@gmail.com wrote:
tag k='attributation' v='Australian Communications and Media
Authority,
On 28 May 2010 15:07, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
I came across one of these (Holmesglen TAFE, Moorabbin). Was I
supposed to do anything more than move it to what appears to be the
actual tower (nearmap) and remove the fixme:to_be_reviewed (or
whatever) tag?
Unless you have
tag k='attributation' v='Australian Communications and Media
Authority, Register of Radiocommunications Licences' /
tag k='attributation:url' v='http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_9150' /
Should these keys be attribution instead of attributation?
Alex.
On Wed, 26 May 2010 10:28:24 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 May 2010 10:23, Alex Lum sierra.os...@gmail.com wrote:
tag k='attributation' v='Australian Communications and Media
Authority, Register of Radiocommunications Licences' /
tag k='attributation:url'
Have since uploaded these locations:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4757013
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
I've managed to convert most of the relevant information from the ACMA
spread sheet and convert it to OSM format using nodes and relations,
including start and end dates for temporary licenses.
So the question now is what to do with the data, there is 2,152
locations and 7,633
Sorry forgot to attach a sample tower for comments on the tags I used.
sample.osm
Description: Binary data
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On Mon, 17 May 2010, John Smith wrote:
The current tagging scheme for doing transponders don't seem to take
multiple transponders on the same tower:
multiple transponders and transmitters is normal, isn't it?
(puts on ham radio hat)
___
Talk-au
On 17 May 2010 20:12, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
multiple transponders and transmitters is normal, isn't it?
(puts on ham radio hat)
Not always, think older AM radio mast installations, especially in
rural areas...
___
Talk-au mailing list
On Tue, 18 May 2010, you wrote:
On 17 May 2010 20:12, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
multiple transponders and transmitters is normal, isn't it?
(puts on ham radio hat)
Not always, think older AM radio mast installations, especially in
rural areas...
that's this
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2010, you wrote:
On 17 May 2010 20:12, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
multiple transponders and transmitters is normal, isn't it?
(puts on ham radio hat)
Not always, think older AM radio mast installations, especially in
rural
On 18 May 2010 08:04, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
around here every mast has heaps of transmitters
tower space can be sold for good money
a single transmitter on a tower is rare, unless we map these ones
Maybe so, but the data the ACMA released only covers TV and radio
stations, it
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:29 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 May 2010 08:04, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
around here every mast has heaps of transmitters
tower space can be sold for good money
a single transmitter on a tower is rare, unless we map these
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:29 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 18 May 2010 08:04, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
around here every mast has heaps of transmitters
tower space can be sold for good money
a
On Tue, 18 May 2010, John Smith wrote:
On 18 May 2010 09:35, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir maxi...@gmail.com wrote:
The original data source contains all those kinds of things:
http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/site_proximity.nearby_sites_list?pMODE=
DMSpLAT=-35.13873086pLONG=149.17643464
It
On Tue, 18 May 2010, John Smith wrote:
On 18 May 2010 09:50, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
Interesting, lists commercial licencees only
That's a list of transmission sites, while most are probably
commercial installations, I'm guessing some of the transponders will
be for community radio
On 18 May 2010 10:29, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
FF3 or Konqueror was enough to get a listing of the sites close to a given
area
despite a piece saying xml error
They have a map, but I couldn't get it to work, just the XML errors in frames...
___
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:41 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still after
suggestions on how to tag multiple transponders for the same node, I
don't think tagging multiple nodes on the same spot is a good idea,
using a single node + multiple relations might work I suppose,
On 18 May 2010 13:00, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Relations should only be used for groups of objects in which each
object may take on a specific role.
Maybe so, but it's often the best way to tag things at present since
you can't have duplicate keys, but in this case you are
CC-by dataset just turned up:
http://data.australia.gov.au/622
It seems pretty straight forward to convert this to .osm format,
suitable for JOSM. However I'm after suggestions on how to deal with
the .osm file(s).
I'm leaning towards producing metro and non-metro data sets and bulk
importing
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:13 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm leaning towards producing metro and non-metro data sets and bulk
importing the non-metro data sets and then offering the metro data
sets on a request basis, or is there a better way to handle this and
other
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:13 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm leaning towards producing metro and non-metro data sets and bulk
importing the non-metro data sets and then offering the metro data
sets on a request basis, or is there a better way to handle this and
other
On 17 May 2010 15:07, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that because you're worried there will be a lot of duplicates with
existing data in metro areas? Could you perhaps import it all, but
Some people were upset at previous imports in metro areas.
23 matches
Mail list logo