On 6 September 2011 13:26, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote:
Nearmap is no longer an acceptable source for OSM, since they do not allow
traces from their imagery to be re-licensed. I notice at least one of your
edits sourced nearmap, and that isn't allowed any more. If you were using
Hi -
I am a new contributor to OSM and in the spirit of
people shouldn't map areas when they don't have any knowledge of the
topology and layout because I think fixing errors takes several orders
of magnitude longer
I would appreciate a 'contribution review'.
I know the area but I little
Hi Richard,
Welcome to OSM.
A few observations.
Nearmap is no longer an acceptable source for OSM, since they do not allow
traces from their imagery to be re-licensed. I notice at least one of your
edits sourced nearmap, and that isn't allowed any more. If you were using
Potlatch, perhaps you
On 06/09/11 11:26, Ian Sergeant wrote:
Hi Richard,
Welcome to OSM.
A few observations.
Nearmap is no longer an acceptable source for OSM, since they do not
allow traces from their imagery to be re-licensed. I notice at least
one of your edits sourced nearmap, and that isn't allowed any more.
On 6 September 2011 13:44, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
If you look in the history you will see that it's prior to 17 July 2011 and
not added by Richard as a source he has just added more detail.
Oops, sorry, I should have checked the history.
Thanks for picking that up.
Ian.
5 matches
Mail list logo