Re: [talk-au] Contribution review??

2011-09-06 Thread John Smith
On 6 September 2011 13:26, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote: Nearmap is no longer an acceptable source for OSM, since they do not allow traces from their imagery to be re-licensed. I notice at least one of your edits sourced nearmap, and that isn't allowed any more. If you were using

[talk-au] Contribution review??

2011-09-05 Thread Richard Ames
Hi - I am a new contributor to OSM and in the spirit of people shouldn't map areas when they don't have any knowledge of the topology and layout because I think fixing errors takes several orders of magnitude longer I would appreciate a 'contribution review'. I know the area but I little

Re: [talk-au] Contribution review??

2011-09-05 Thread Ian Sergeant
Hi Richard, Welcome to OSM. A few observations. Nearmap is no longer an acceptable source for OSM, since they do not allow traces from their imagery to be re-licensed. I notice at least one of your edits sourced nearmap, and that isn't allowed any more. If you were using Potlatch, perhaps you

Re: [talk-au] Contribution review??

2011-09-05 Thread Ross Scanlon
On 06/09/11 11:26, Ian Sergeant wrote: Hi Richard, Welcome to OSM. A few observations. Nearmap is no longer an acceptable source for OSM, since they do not allow traces from their imagery to be re-licensed. I notice at least one of your edits sourced nearmap, and that isn't allowed any more.

Re: [talk-au] Contribution review??

2011-09-05 Thread Ian Sergeant
On 6 September 2011 13:44, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote: If you look in the history you will see that it's prior to 17 July 2011 and not added by Richard as a source he has just added more detail. Oops, sorry, I should have checked the history. Thanks for picking that up. Ian.