: OSM Australian Talk List talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] How many NearMap users do you think have accepted the
new CTs and ODbL?
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 23:18 +0800, Andrew Gregory wrote:
In any case, I expect that when it comes time to actually apply the
new license, any
Kelley
Sent from my HTC
-Original Message-
From: David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au
Sent: Monday, 2 May 2011 10:17
To: Andrew Gregory andrew.greg...@gmail.com
Cc: OSM Australian Talk List talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] How many NearMap users do you think have
On 26 April 2011 21:24, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
How many OSM users have accepted the new terms, without fully
understanding that sources they have used in the past prohibit them from
doing so.
Using my australian test extract from 21/03/2011, I found that 3390
users have
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 23:18 +0800, Andrew Gregory wrote:
Thankfully, I've been careful to use source=nearmap. I've also been
making a point to go around and survey streets I've traced, check
their alignment, name them and set source=survey.
Unless youve realigned the ways based on GPS tracks
On 2 May 2011 08:17, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 23:18 +0800, Andrew Gregory wrote:
Thankfully, I've been careful to use source=nearmap. I've also been
making a point to go around and survey streets I've traced, check
their alignment, name them and set
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 12:40 +0800, Andrew Gregory wrote:
Unless youve realigned the ways based on GPS tracks after you traced
from nearmap, tagging the ways as source=survey is incorrect. You
can add a source:name=survey or similar, but if youve traced from a
source, just because you
I was wondering this question tonight.
How many OSM users have accepted the new terms, without fully
understanding that sources they have used in the past prohibit them from
doing so.
So, I wrote a little script to find out and the numbers are surprising.
Using my australian test extract from
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
I was wondering this question tonight.
[ ... ]
This only shows where there is clear evidence of licence violations
without having to look past the data's tags.
[ ... ]
Food for thought
Junk food at best. ;-) OSM
- Original Message -
From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
To: OSM Australian Talk List talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] How many NearMap users do you think have accepted the
new CTs and ODbL?
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:24:09 +1000
David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Using my australian test extract from 21/03/2011, I found that 3390
users have made edits in the area of interest (the Australian extract
available on osmaustralia.org).
Of these 3390 users, 536 have used the tag
On 27 April 2011 04:15, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
But I thought that Nearmap has said that they did not think the CT's were
compatible with the use of their data. As I understood it this had nothing
to do with CC-BY-SA or ODbL.
So the issue as I understand it is the CT's,
11 matches
Mail list logo
