On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 14:46, Josh Marshall
wrote:
> A tangent, but I'm rather happy that iD _*finally_* fixed their English
> description for =track (it included "unmaintained" for a long time; many
> were quite annoyed at the original change to include that)... and I can't
> find any
Ah, I think I've let the mapping of tracks local to me influence my stance
too much. And for context of my interest here, my plan was to bikepack
the Track but that got put off due to covid and family.
The Australian guidelines don't say much about =tertiary, but bouncing over
to the main
On 21/2/23 14:42, Josh Marshall wrote:
Australian road tagging guidelines at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads arguably
override the general OSM guidelines, and they read:
highway=track: "Service and access roads that aren't part of the
general road
Australian road tagging guidelines at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Roads
arguably
override the general OSM guidelines, and they read:
highway=track: "Service and access roads that aren't part of the general
road network. Generally not paved, often not public
The name should not constrain the classification of the highway (e.g. Dowling
Track, Ooodnadatta Track). And, as I've commented previously in other threads,
the DCS NSW Base Map can be quite outdated.
However, a quick look at a YouTube video suggests that the Bridle Track should
still be
Hi
This track is now continuous having been closed due to a rock fall and
road collapse at Monaghans Bluff.
Given the importance of the road and that it is not really a 'track' in
the OSM sense (Roads for mostly agricultural or forestry uses) ... and
that the DCS Base Map places it at
6 matches
Mail list logo
