On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:41:59 +1100
Matt White mattwh...@iinet.com.au wrote:
I have a sneaking suspicion that National Parks and State Forests are
defined by acts of Parliament at the federal and state levels
respectively, so the co-ord are probably in Hansard somewhere...
Well,
Hugh Barnes wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:41:59 +1100
Matt White mattwh...@iinet.com.au wrote:
I have a sneaking suspicion that National Parks and State Forests are
defined by acts of Parliament at the federal and state levels
respectively, so the co-ord are probably in
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Matt White wrote:
How are people mapping National Park (or state forest or other
government mandated areas)? It seems that in a lot of cases, there is no
way of actually doing an on the ground survey - a lot of the boundaries
aren't marked, the areas can be massively
How are people mapping National Park (or state forest or other
government mandated areas)? It seems that in a lot of cases, there is no
way of actually doing an on the ground survey - a lot of the boundaries
aren't marked, the areas can be massively inaccessible etc.
Add to that things like
b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:
As it stands this hasn't really been addressed. Generally I just mark
what's on the ground, ie the natural=wood boundary as this tends to
give a reasonable indication of the national park boundary anyway.
Obviously this has limits, but unless some government
5 matches
Mail list logo
