Re: [talk-au] OSM-F seems to be a sinking ship... (was: Wiki + Data Sources + Licensing Categories)

2011-04-10 Thread Franc Carter
[snip] It's starting to become painfully obvious that OSM-F wouldn't be able to organise a piss up in a brewery, and there seems to be little or no chance that they can actually pull off the license change over in some kind of demotactic, moral and smooth change over so I'm basically

[talk-au] OSM-F seems to be a sinking ship... (was: Wiki + Data Sources + Licensing Categories)

2011-04-09 Thread John Smith
On 9 April 2011 09:09, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: On 8 April 2011 20:47, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: On 8 April 2011 16:58, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote: Despite your attempts to sidetrack this discussion from the your data import to some wider OSM

Re: [talk-au] OSM-F seems to be a sinking ship... (was: Wiki + Data Sources + Licensing Categories)

2011-04-09 Thread 4x4falcon
On 10/04/11 13:14, John Smith wrote: On 9 April 2011 09:09, John Smithdeltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: On 8 April 2011 20:47, John Smithdeltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote: On 8 April 2011 16:58, Ian Sergeantinas66+...@gmail.com wrote: Despite your attempts to sidetrack this discussion from

Re: [talk-au] OSM-F seems to be a sinking ship... (was: Wiki + Data Sources + Licensing Categories)

2011-04-09 Thread John Smith
On 10 April 2011 15:29, 4x4falcon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote: At the moment I'm tending to fosm.org as it seems the most compatible with what I've been doing. Having said that I'm still watching commonmap.org etc as well. Well from a license point of view, all commonmap data should be usable