On 25/2/10 3:59 AM, Liz wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Roy Wallace wrote:
This, on the other hand, may well be true. But IMHO this is NOT a
reason to limit what gets entered into the OSM database, but simply to
*pre-process* the OSM data (filtering out unwanted details as desired)
prior to
On 25 February 2010 18:57, Sam Wilson s...@archives.org.au wrote:
Of course, it's that slippery slope again: at what point will someone
come along and want to map footpaths as areas?! Actually, the GIS data
that I'm most familiar with (not to imply that I'm familiar with it at
all, really) is
On 25/2/10 6:05 PM, Richard Colless wrote:
in to the 50m level. The attached file shows what it looks like on my
Etrex. The footways are much smaller than the roads, and don't really
add to the clutter. In fact, when I zoomed in to 8m the display became
less cluttered. So I guess we can
On 25 February 2010 20:37, Sam Wilson s...@archives.org.au wrote:
In terms of map clutter, that parking off to the left is more of a
worry: it's tagged access=private, so surely shouldn't really be mapped?
Mapped, or shown on maps?
___
Talk-au
On 25/2/10 7:07 PM, John Smith wrote:
Mapped, or shown on maps?
Ah yes, right: shown on /that/ map.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Hi all!
With the excellent resolution of the nearmap images, the smallest
detailscan easily be added. But is this always a good idea?
Have a look at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-32.073593lon=115.755062zoom=18
The footways along Duoro Road and Harbour Street (but not the one
between them!)
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Michael spam...@gmx-ist-cool.de wrote:
The footways along Duoro Road and Harbour Street (but not the one
between them!) do not carry any information IMHO
I disagree. They indicate that there is a footway there. If it's a
verifiable fact, IMHO it rightly
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Roy Wallace wrote:
but clutter the map
display, especially on GPS units. With three times as much nodes per
meter of the street(the actual road + 2 footways), data processing and
editing is getting ever more resource hungry.
This, on the other hand, may well be
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
This, on the other hand, may well be true. But IMHO this is NOT a
reason to limit what gets entered into the OSM database, but simply to
*pre-process* the OSM data (filtering out unwanted details as desired)
prior to loading onto
9 matches
Mail list logo
