On 12/09/19 21:06, Sebastian S. wrote:
Good discussion,
I also think the track should be mapped.
Aside from access no I think it might be worthwhile adding
decommissioned or rehabilitation tags to tracks that should not be
used to indicate their intended end.
Other thoughts are:
- why show
September 2019 6:04 PM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Paths in Illawarra Conservation Lands
Hi,
On 12.09.19 09:29, Frederik Ramm wrote:
"Come for a serious bushwalk or a casual jog, visit a lookout in the
winter for whale watching off the coast, or break out the binoc
Frederik
Sorry for the delay replying
There are indeed some nuances, for example there is general agreement in
the community not to map the nesting places of rare birds (lest eggs be
stolen), and a similar general agreement exists for things like women's
refuges
Ecological damage from the
between states.
Cheers - Phil
-Original Message-
From: Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org]
Sent: Thursday, 12 September 2019 6:04 PM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Paths in Illawarra Conservation Lands
Hi,
On 12.09.19 09:29, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> &q
Good discussion,
I also think the track should be mapped.
Aside from access no I think it might be worthwhile adding decommissioned or
rehabilitation tags to tracks that should not be used to indicate their
intended end.
Other thoughts are:
- why show access=no tracks on the map? Admittedly
>
> Frederick,
If I use the term bush walking colloquially, then it means to use a
track that already exists., either single track or 4wd track (fire trail)
predominantly however there might be times where you cross a grass land
where there is no well defined track.
If you are talking about
Hi,
On 12.09.19 09:29, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> "Come for a serious bushwalk or a casual jog, visit a lookout in the
> winter for whale watching off the coast, or break out the binoculars for
> birdwatching. There are cycling opportunities on fire trails and plenty
> of chances to cool off in
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 17:29, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> "Come for a serious bushwalk or a casual jog, visit a lookout in the
> winter for whale watching off the coast, or break out the binoculars for
> birdwatching. There are cycling opportunities on fire trails and plenty
> of chances to cool off
Hi,
On 12.09.19 08:16, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> Within the Illawarra Escarpment State Conservation Area, NPWS says the
> only two things prohibited are Pets and
> Smoking,
>
First up, I appreciate your work mediating here Frederik, thank you.
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 15:46, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> On 12.09.19 06:27, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> > It's always better to have this mapped based on confirmations on the
> > ground, and it appears in this case that the local
Hi,
On 12.09.19 06:27, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> It's always better to have this mapped based on confirmations on the
> ground, and it appears in this case that the local mapper Zhent, has
> been mapping based on local knowledge.
I have a feeling that Zhent's "foot=yes" might not mean "there is a
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 13:45, Greg Lauer wrote:
> Hi Frederick,
>
> There is 'authoratative' data available for NPWS estate -
> https://data.nsw.gov.au/data/dataset?q=NPWS+track===_format=_id==score+desc%2C+metadata_modified+desc
> and
> we have a waiver -
>
On 12/9/19 05:31, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
Since then the pressure from the mountain bike community to has map
everything has reduced, presumably the mountain bike community has
realized that OSM is one of the tools the authorities use to locate
illegal trails.
That's only going to
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 06:23, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> On 9/11/19 21:31, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
> > The construction and use of unauthorized trails is illegal with large
> > penalties (though I have never heard of a prosecution).
>
> Are there sources that are not restricted by copyright
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 23:40, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the DWG was drawn into an edit war regarding several paths that were
> mapped in this area:
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-34.3740/150.8761
>
> The argument is about in how far the (largely north-south running) paths
> are
Hi Frederick,
There is 'authoratative' data available for NPWS estate -
https://data.nsw.gov.au/data/dataset?q=NPWS+track===_format=_id==score+desc%2C+metadata_modified+desc
and
we have a waiver -
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_data_catalogue. The problem
is that the data is not
Tony,
On 9/11/19 21:31, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
> The construction and use of unauthorized trails is illegal with large
> penalties (though I have never heard of a prosecution).
Are there sources that are not restricted by copyright that we could use
to determine which trails are
Hi Frederik
This reminds me of a thread that I started on this list about 2 years
ago. It related to illegal mountain bike tracks in Lysterfield Park,
Victoria Australia.
The construction and use of unauthorized trails is illegal with large
penalties (though I have never heard of a
Hi,
the DWG was drawn into an edit war regarding several paths that were
mapped in this area:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-34.3740/150.8761
The argument is about in how far the (largely north-south running) paths
are "illegal" and whether they need to be removed from the map because
19 matches
Mail list logo
