Re: [talk-au] State Forest boundaries

My proposal will not work as the notification about the rendering for boundary=protected_area https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=734592#p734592 only applies to a few classes of protected areas as I read later

Re: [talk-au] State Forest boundaries

I'm not sure that the changes to OSM Carto will solve this issue as I think only a few protect classes have been affected - but perhaps it is worth trying. I would like to see boundaries for a different reason - where two state forests are adjacent, the boundary between the two is not visible.

Re: [talk-au] State Forest boundaries

If a specific protect_class seems seems too uncertain I guess protection_title= State Forest would be sufficient. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:protection_title Nevw > On 26 Jan 2019, at 5:44 pm, nwastra wrote: > > > Hi > the gazetted State Forest boundaries are not rendered

Re: [talk-au] State Forest boundaries

On 26/01/19 18:44, nwastra wrote: Hi the gazetted State Forest boundaries are not rendered currently on the default map on the OpenStreetMap (OpenStreetMap Carto). landuse=forest is considered as forestry use and natural=wood are natural wooded areas not subject to forestry but both are

[talk-au] State Forest boundaries

Hi the gazetted State Forest boundaries are not rendered currently on the default map on the OpenStreetMap (OpenStreetMap Carto). landuse=forest is considered as forestry use and natural=wood are natural wooded areas not subject to forestry but both are rendered the same. When the State Forest