BlueMM bluemm1975-...@yahoo.com wrote:
I also like Jack's suggestion on name old_name, plus the is_in tag.
+1 for the is_in tag from me, definitely with , Australia appended.
My reasons are pretty selfish - My choice of GPS software is Navit and
it requires the is_in tag to search for towns.
Ok, it seems my conversion script is now producing sane results so it's time
to work out what the final output should look like.
The first question that I think we need to answer is, how do we represent
the
data in OSM, there appears to be 3 options:-
1. Closed ways
2. Relations
3.
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:09:15 +1100
Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, it seems my conversion script is now producing sane results so
it's time to work out what the final output should look like.
The first question that I think we need to answer is, how do we
represent the
data
, 2009 10:10 pm
Subject: [talk-au] Suburb boundaries - getting close
To: OSM Australian Talk List talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Ok, it seems my conversion script is now producing sane results
so it's time
to work out what the final output should look like.
The first question that I think we need
Franc Carter franc.car...@... writes:
Ok, it seems my conversion script is now producing sane results so it's time
to work out what the final output should look like.
The first question that I think we need to answer is, how do we represent the
data in OSM, there appears to be 3 options:-
5 matches
Mail list logo
