On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep - I will look in to that but from looking in to the code it looks
hard(ish) as I don't see a generic approach for dealing with ways that
are concatenated to form closed way.
Navit would then have problems rendering
-
From: Franc Carter [mailto:franc.car...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 26 April 2011 7:59 PM
To: OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: [talk-au] navit and bays/coastline around Sydney
Hi,
I remember there was a discussion a while ago tagging of bays - which
I didn;t pay much attention too
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I remember there was a discussion a while ago tagging of bays - which
I didn;t pay much attention too ;-(
They now seem to be in a relation for each Bay, which is nice for
defining the area of the bay. However
[snip]
I've been aiming to tag bays as areas rather than just a node in the
centre. As a consequence my initial thought was to tag the area as
natural=bay. Traditionally most renderers didn't render this as water.
the OSM Mapnik style now does, but many others still don't. The
problem was I
Some experimenting this morning indicates this is fixed in the version I run
(svn 2453)
cheers
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
navit files built form osm data don't show a road if there is a reuse of
the
admin boundary for the road
and so navigation around
Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:55 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
I wonder if it's possible to duplicate the object to break it up into
2 objects instead of one, and strip appropriate tags from the
respective objects.
Yep, that's
Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.9378lon=138.6228zoom=13layers=B000FTF
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.2954lon=138.9733zoom=12layers=B000FTF
Using the latest SVN version of osm2navit, these two and the one near
Robertson NSW seem to turn out
Has anyone got a permalink to an area with this issue, so that I've got
something to test
with
thanks
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
navit files built form osm data don't show a road if there is a reuse of
the
admin boundary for the road
and so navigation
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Franc Carter wrote:
Has anyone got a permalink to an area with this issue, so that I've got
something to test
with
thanks
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
navit files built form osm data don't show a road if there is a reuse of
the
navit files built form osm data don't show a road if there is a reuse of the
admin boundary for the road
and so navigation around adelaide is going to be really interesting
as a lot of main roads have just disappeared
please guys
don't reuse admin boundaries ( like ABS ) to replace perfectly
2009/10/13 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
navit files built form osm data don't show a road if there is a reuse of the
admin boundary for the road
and so navigation around adelaide is going to be really interesting
as a lot of main roads have just disappeared
please guys
don't reuse admin
2009/10/13 Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, John Smith wrote:
This is really a bug in their software, specifically the osm2navit
binary, it would be better to file a bug and get them to fix the issue
rather than trying to work around their bugs.
Have you filed a bug
I've been looking over the navit code and have made some minor tweaks to
suite me.
My first guess is that the issue might be able to be worked around by
changing the order
that osm2navit looks at properties - e.g making ti look at decide these are
roads instead
of boundaries.
Of course this will
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Pretty sure I had the same issue when I tried to report their routing
engine was screwy too.
The idlers and lurkers will read the backlog when they return.
Conversations can go very slowly this way, but communication is
possible.
Bug tracker:
2009/10/13 Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.com:
I've been looking over the navit code and have made some minor tweaks to
suite me.
My first guess is that the issue might be able to be worked around by
changing the order
that osm2navit looks at properties - e.g making ti look at decide these
this might just be a silly / basic question
how does one tell Navit to allow one to drive on the motorway?
I double checked, its set to car, not to horse cycle or pedestrian, and it
won't send me along a motorway
or is this a problem with au data??
Liz
who luckily knew the way because it
Interesting, It puts me on motorways all the time (sometimes it would be
nice to
have more choice). Have you checked the oneways etc. Have you got a
permalink
to a problematic road
cheers
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 7:26 PM, ed...@billiau.net wrote:
this might just be a silly / basic question
Interesting, It puts me on motorways all the time (sometimes it would be
nice to
have more choice). Have you checked the oneways etc. Have you got a
permalink
to a problematic road
cheers
150km of Hume Highway
and a few km in wollongong
same thing
motorway sends me to go down first exit
I tried a few random points on the Hume and on the way down to
wollongong and
'it works for me' ;-(
I'm using a recentish svn version and one of John's recentish
Australia.bin
files
cheers
i've got a very recent (yesterday) bin file from John, but I'll try the
upgrade from svn
I'm not
I tried a few random points on the Hume and on the way down to
wollongong and
'it works for me' ;-(
I'm using a recentish svn version and one of John's recentish
Australia.bin
files
cheers
i've got a very recent (yesterday) bin file from John, but I'll try the
upgrade from svn
I'm
I seem to have overlooked the update script since rebuilding the
server, I've manually run this and a new navit file is now available:
http://map-data.bigtincan.com/data/Australia-20090831.navit.bin
I've now setup a cronjob to do this automatically after lunch on Sundays.
Does the ABS have other boundaries which we can use for this? For example
Sydney currently would just refer to the Sydney LGA, rather than that area
which people would call Greater Sydney.
Basically, do they publish boundaries such as greater sydney the newcastle
region etc?
If they don't
--- On Fri, 7/8/09, b.schulz...@scu.edu.au b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:
I'm just trying to brainstorm a way of achieving what
you're describing while still conforming to strict
boundary sources as opposed to drawing a boundary around a
town by hand.
As far as I'm aware this is the
I think the latter.
- Ben.
-Original Message-
From: b.schulz...@scu.edu.au
Sent: 07 August 2009 13:33
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] navit
I wonder, how hard would it be to write a script which looked at the ABS
boundaries and placed an is_in= tag on every way
John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
Nothing special, just followed the directions on this wiki page:
http://www.rigacci.org/wiki/doku.php/doc/appunti/hardware/eeepc_navit
As a result, most of the towns and suburbs in Australia can't be
searched for due to a lack of is_in tags. My patch
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Sam Couter s...@couter.id.au wrote:
As a result, most of the towns and suburbs in Australia
can't be
searched for due to a lack of is_in tags. My patch for
osm2navit
(attached) is a bit heavy-handed but trivial. If you've got
a build
environment set up for navit, give
I just ran the new osm2navit over a data file a couple of days old and it went
from 40M to 50M as a result of the extra is_in data.
http://maps.bigtincan.com/data/Australia-20090804.navit.bin
___
Talk-au mailing list
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, b.schulz...@scu.edu.au b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:
I wonder, how hard would it be to
write a script which looked at the ABS boundaries and placed
an is_in= tag on every way/node/whatever which is completely
within the multipolygon relation?
You don't need the is_in
--- On Fri, 7/8/09, Sam Couter s...@couter.id.au wrote:
That one seems to work much better.
It's a bit of a hack but it would be much better if navit pulled the is_in
information from admin boundaries, there is a boundary for most countries and
things within Australia.
--- On Tue, 28/7/09, Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent thanks - I'll be interested in the Aussie
file
It's too much of a hassle to do daily files, but I'm setting up scripts to run
after lunchtime on Sundays at present, the Aussie file is up, and the NZ one is
still
Thanks, weekly is very useful anyway.
I've just returned from a mapping trip, that used your navit map on my car
computer - it was
very useful for finding missed streets
cheers
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 2:51 PM, John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Tue, 28/7/09, Franc Carter
--- On Wed, 29/7/09, Mark Hetherington mark-os...@hethos.org wrote:
I'm very interested in the Australia image. I'm curious how
it's being processed though, when I did the processing
myself I found searching in navit did not work. My
investigations to this point indicated I needed a patched
For those that are interested, I'll be building a daily or weekly navit file, I
ran it over aussie data only and the file comes out to about 41M, and if there
is any interest I could keep building a NZ only file and it'll be about 4M.
http://maps.bigtincan.com/data/Australia-20090728.navit.bin
33 matches
Mail list logo
