Re: [talk-au] suspicious edits in Victoria need reverting?

On 1/8/22 09:58, Adam Horan wrote: There's a small chance that they're proposed roads, but most likely they're made up. I think all 3 changesets from this user need reverting. However the names are suitable for the areas where they've been added, so someone has put some work into it.

Re: [talk-au] suspicious edits in Victoria need reverting?

It seems that edit were reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124325240 Aug 1, 2022, 00:52 by nwas...@gmail.com: > Hi > there is some recent mapping around southern Victoria and the greater > Melbourne area that seem to be incorrect and need reverting but I am not > familiar

Re: [talk-au] suspicious edits in Victoria need reverting?

I've now asked them for proof that the church exists, but probably a waste of time. Thanks Graeme On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 at 12:39, Little Maps wrote: > I chanced upon the supposed new “Ballan - Corio Motorway (M8)” this > morning too. This must be a complete fabrication. It goes straight through

Re: [talk-au] suspicious edits in Victoria need reverting?

I chanced upon the supposed new “Ballan - Corio Motorway (M8)” this morning too. This must be a complete fabrication. It goes straight through the Brisbane Ranges NP and there would have been an outcry if such a road was even proposed, let alone completed. I fully support reverting all of the

Re: [talk-au] suspicious edits in Victoria need reverting?

There's a small chance that they're proposed roads, but most likely they're made up. I think all 3 changesets from this user need reverting. However the names are suitable for the areas where they've been added, so someone has put some work into it. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082655836

Re: [talk-au] suspicious edits in Victoria need reverting?

Re-posted on Discord for further comments Thanks Graeme On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 at 08:56, nwastra nwastra wrote: > Hi > there is some recent mapping around southern Victoria and the greater > Melbourne area that seem to be incorrect and need reverting but I am not > familiar enough with the area

[talk-au] suspicious edits in Victoria need reverting?

Hi there is some recent mapping around southern Victoria and the greater Melbourne area that seem to be incorrect and need reverting but I am not familiar enough with the area to be sure. The new roads seem fictitious but could be proposed approximate new routes I suppose. Could mappers more