Re: [talk-au] Stormwater drains

2017-05-11 Thread nwastra
could also add substance=water if you think it is not obvious. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpipeline > On 11 May 2017, at 8:49 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote: > >> >> drain or culvert. > >> Am I justified in retagging as man_made=pipeline

Re: [talk-au] Stormwater drains

2017-05-11 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 11 May 2017 at 02:24, wrote: > drain or culvert. > Am I justified in retagging as man_made=pipeline location=underground? "Pipeline" is less specific - pipelines can carry, for example, oil or aviation fuel. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing

Re: [talk-au] Stormwater drains

2017-05-10 Thread Phil (The Geek) Wyatt
The only maps I can see are http://www.hurstville.nsw.gov.au/Hurstville-City-Maps.html and correct, no sign of any authority to use the data I also wouldn't change any flows at this stage as there could be pump stations within the system that alter what looks like correct flows. -Original

Re: [talk-au] Stormwater drains

2017-05-10 Thread Andrew Harvey
You could contact the Data Working Group to put in place a ban until they read a message asking them to respond about importing copyrighted data. On 11 May 2017 11:24 AM, wrote: > Hi > > User Spookylad https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Spookylad appears to be > mapping