John Smith-129 wrote:
--- On Tue, 11/8/09, BlueMM bluemm1975-...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've found Google Maps directions in Australia to be very
good in the past, it
seems to pick the best route the majority of the time.
At times I've been routed along no through roads, other times google
John Smith-129 wrote:
--- On Tue, 11/8/09, BlueMM bluemm1975-...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've found Google Maps directions in Australia to be very good in the
past, it
seems to pick the best route the majority of the time.
At times I've been routed along no through roads, other times google
John Smith-129 wrote:
--- On Mon, 17/8/09, BlueMM bluemm1975-...@yahoo.com wrote:
A few questions:
1. I presume the addr:country=Australia is manditory for this to work,
but
:state optional? I could imagine only needing state for state specific
sheilds (ie. nationally consistent ones
--- On Mon, 17/8/09, BlueMM bluemm1975-...@yahoo.com wrote:
But my point was if they *are* consistent (same shield
design), why specify
state?
Consistent to what?
Some states have gone to a alphanumeric system, some use the old NH shields and
those with the alphanumeric system have
On 17/08/2009, at 11:07 AM, John Smith wrote:
--- On Mon, 17/8/09, Ben Kelley ben.kel...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess the problems with this would be:
* Duplication with public toilets that are already marked
Only import toilets where there is no node=amenity within 250-500m,
throw them into
I emailed asking for an image of Australia a while back, and finally got a
reply today:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/peterito/3829717632/
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
--- On Mon, 17/8/09, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:
I'll have a look around to see what's already been done for
this, but
it shouldn't be too hard to. If the search is of the form
'X near Y'
then do a place lookup on Y, and if you find Y, then look
for nearby
nodes with:
*
Hi.
Isn't that pretty much what the current OSM namefinder attempts to do?
e.g. a search for park near Sydney or toilet near Sydney
- Ben.
2009/8/17 James Livingston doc...@mac.com
I'll have a look around to see what's already been done for this, but
it shouldn't be too hard to. If the
On 15/08/2009, at 12:10 AM, John Smith wrote:
--- On Fri, 14/8/09, Graeme Wilson wandere...@live.com.au wrote:
Check the Snowy Valley Hwy around Khancoban. There are two
of them.
I'm not familiar with the that part of the country, can you give me
a rough lat/lon or can you copy and paste
Hi,
The mystery road was removed almost immediately by a mystery OSMer straight
after I first posted it.
On OSM the road is marked as Alpine Way. I am sure it is called The Snowy
Valley Highway, not to be confused with the Snowy Mountains Highway.
SVH (Alpine Way) goes from around
--- On Tue, 18/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
From Map Maker, Google has made the entire dataset of
Africa fully
available for download by non-profits, government agencies
and
individuals to create and enhance their own non-commercial
map-related
projects.
OSM doesn't
--- On Tue, 18/8/09, Graeme Wilson wandere...@live.com.au wrote:
On OSM the road is marked as Alpine Way. I am
sure it is called The Snowy Valley Highway, not to be
confused with the Snowy Mountains Highway.
It could be both at the same time.
--- On Tue, 18/8/09, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
i've just made a relation for the
whole of the Sturt Highway, and added route
number relations for the victorian and nsw parts.
please take the opportunity to check that I've got this
right
because i may have selected wrong parts or done
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:23 PM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Tue, 18/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
From Map Maker, Google has made the entire dataset of
Africa fully
available for download by non-profits, government agencies
and
individuals to create and
It seems you haven't include all parts as there is gaps
between sections when you sort the relation.
Sorry, I didn't notice the multi road intersections, that would have caused the
gaps.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, John Smith wrote:
It seems you haven't include all parts as there is gaps between sections
when you sort the relation.
A later version of JOSM 1900ish has a much nicer relation interface.
I tried to pick up all the bridges and roundabouts
but i'll get a new JOSM
I've been marking all members in a relation as a role member not
forward/backward as we don't have official designations such as
east/west/north/south like they do on US interstates.
I'm not saying I'm right but it is less work :)
You have ref=NHA20 for NHA20 in SA, but I'm not sure what to do
--- On Tue, 18/8/09, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
I tried to pick up all the bridges and roundabouts
but i'll get a new JOSM
You did, but I didn't notice the 3 diff ways at the nsw only end of things,
they probably confused JOSM. The comment about the relation editor just makes
it
--- On Tue, 18/8/09, John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
I think I'd just tag it as ref=20, network=A and then we
can add a rule to show NH shields for these routes for
addr:state=South Australia
Hmmm that wouldn't work either, since other network=A aren't NH, maybe the
network will
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, John Smith wrote:
I've been marking all members in a relation as a role member not
forward/backward as we don't have official designations such as
east/west/north/south like they do on US interstates.
so i make them all member?
then can get altered later
I'm not
20 matches
Mail list logo
