Re: [talk-au] parking and bike lane

If there's nothing marked on the road in the roundabout, then you can just omit the cycle lane tag from the roundabout. On Sun., 29 Dec. 2019, 2:21 pm Graeme Fitzpatrick, wrote: > > Thanks > > Graeme > > > On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 at 16:52, David Wales wrote: > >> I prefer to use separate ways for

Re: [talk-au] parking and bike lane

I agree that if there is nothing marked, however my question was rather from a continuity point of view. The roads into and out of the round about have cycle lanes. The cyclist needs to merge with the road traffic to pass through. Should the roundabout have cycle=designated or yes to ensure

[talk-au] DEA Hotspots map - no attribution?

Hi Just saw the new DEA / GA hotspots map for the first time. One of the map layers you can choose is OSM, but it doesn't appear to have any attribution on it? Could somebody please check & confirm? Thanks Graeme ___ Talk-au mailing list

Re: [talk-au] DEA Hotspots map - no attribution?

Thanks fellas! You're not wrong it's hard to see, especially when said little icon is sitting over pale grey land! On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 at 15:46, Phil Wyatt wrote: > > > Probably want to change the standard letter to point out that the > attribution should not be behind a button – needs to be

Re: [talk-au] Question re tagging unpaved vs paved roads

If you just delete the tag, someone might interpret it as an accidental deletion. A changed tag is clearly a deliberate decision based on new information. On Sun, 29 Dec 2019, at 8:52 AM, Bob Cameron wrote: > Hi > > The tagging guidelines don't quite seem to over this. I'd like to do it

Re: [talk-au] Question re tagging unpaved vs paved roads

Okay thanks all. Surprisingly the Snowy Mountains Hwy between Dalgety and (almost) Bombala NSW had 3 unpaved sections near the wind turbine ridge. It has all been fully paved through for more than 3 years. As I drive I use an OSM based map set on my Garmin GPS to route sealed only, so I can

Re: [talk-au] DEA Hotspots map - no attribution?

Hi Graeme, There is a little (i) information icon next to the scale in the bottom left corner that can be clicked for Attributions but it's hard to see because of the color scheme when you switch the base map to OSM. On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 4:36 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > Hi > > Just saw

Re: [talk-au] parking and bike lane

The default for non-highways roads is bicycle=yes so even without any cycle tags the router should still take you though it, but that's a routing decision. Omitting bicycle infrastructure tags from the roundabout helps let you know that you need to merge with traffic to go though the roundabout.

Re: [talk-au] Question re tagging unpaved vs paved roads

On 29/12/19 19:52, Bob Cameron wrote: Hi The tagging guidelines don't quite seem to over this. I'd like to do it correctly. When a road is unpaved we use the surface=unpaved tag, the default (no tag) being paved. When an unpaved road is (roadwork) paved, should the tag be deleted or

Re: [talk-au] DEA Hotspots map - no attribution?

Bottom left corner behind some symbol that you need to click on…and you can barely see! This is what I put in my standard letter (including the code required) Probably want to change the standard letter to point out that the attribution should not be behind a button – needs to be in

[talk-au] Question re tagging unpaved vs paved roads

Hi The tagging guidelines don't quite seem to over this. I'd like to do it correctly. When a road is unpaved we use the surface=unpaved tag, the default (no tag) being paved. When an unpaved road is (roadwork) paved, should the tag be deleted or changed to paved? Thanks

Re: [talk-au] Phone number updates

I did a few. Surely this would be a prime target for an automated edit? Regards, David Wales On 29/12/19 2:22 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > > On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 at 12:36, Phil Wyatt > wrote: > > feel free to join me if you want some mind numbing

Re: [talk-au] Phone number updates

Hi David, It may be for someone more skilled than me  however there are lots of combinations that need to be taken into account Those with no area codes Those with area codes in () Those with area codes but no international code Those with international code but no + sign at the start