On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 19:09, Benjamin Ceravolo
wrote:
> Why not sidewalk:both=separate?
>
Yeah if both sides are the same, then that's better.
PS in case someone hasn't found it yet, JOSM has a map style called
"Sidewalks and footways (with knobs on)" which helps visualising when
editing.
>
> G'day Tom
>
> I don't think there is one, either in Australia, or Internationally!
>
> I must admit to preferring highway=footway, tracing the line of the visible
> footpath on imagery, & only adding crossings at recognised crossing points,
> where a ramp has been
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 14:24, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 13:00, Tom Brennan wrote:
>
>> I've been using the current lockdown to walk and cycle all of the
>> streets of my LGA (Willoughby), and I've been checking back to OSM to
>> see if there's anything needing updating. For
Thanks for the feedback.
Just to summarise my reading of the replies, it sounds like there is:
1. a preference for separately mapped sidewalks (highway=footway +
footway=sidewalk)
2. no harm in also adding tags to the road (sidewalk:both=separate, or
sidewalk:left=separate /
4 matches
Mail list logo
