Chris,
That GA dataset IMHO would form a good base for national/state forests.
Looking at the metadata it is suitable at a 1:5 000 000 scale and therefore
a whole heap of small parks will be missing/totally inaccurate, but as I
said it would provide a base to start updating/adding missing parks
Hi all!
With the excellent resolution of the nearmap images, the smallest
detailscan easily be added. But is this always a good idea?
Have a look at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-32.073593lon=115.755062zoom=18
The footways along Duoro Road and Harbour Street (but not the one
between them!)
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:59 PM, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
I think it is useful. We're used to it with road networks, with
national routes and state routes. Sure, hiking trails are shorter, but
that doesn't mean it's unworkable.
Just so we're on the same page, I understand you as
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Michael spam...@gmx-ist-cool.de wrote:
The footways along Duoro Road and Harbour Street (but not the one
between them!) do not carry any information IMHO
I disagree. They indicate that there is a footway there. If it's a
verifiable fact, IMHO it rightly
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Roy Wallace wrote:
but clutter the map
display, especially on GPS units. With three times as much nodes per
meter of the street(the actual road + 2 footways), data processing and
editing is getting ever more resource hungry.
This, on the other hand, may well be
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
This, on the other hand, may well be true. But IMHO this is NOT a
reason to limit what gets entered into the OSM database, but simply to
*pre-process* the OSM data (filtering out unwanted details as desired)
prior to loading onto
Yeah, but:
The data are subject to Copyright. Data files may be downloaded from
Geoscience Australia's website at www.ga.gov.au/download/. A licence agreement
is required.
Strange wording, and where is this licence agreement?
Steve
___
Talk-au
Steve Bennett wrote:
Just so we're on the same page, I understand you as proposing that we
use NWN for the AAWT and the BNT, and nothing else. Zero IWT, two NWN,
lots of RWN and LWN.
Yes, until we develop other national trails.
I think we can do better.
I don't.
When the Bicentennial
8 matches
Mail list logo
