So those guys put out a legal statement and an employee even gave you his
interpretation on this list, which you can cite in court if you want. I think
you're pretty solid and it feels like people are just looking for problems no
matter what is done or said. :-(
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Jun
This reads like you disagree with taxation or death. I do too, but there's not
much I can do about it. The vast majority of people are happy with where we are
at and now it's down to people holding out because of a comma in the wrong
place or a moral objection to various aspects of intellectual
...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
On 8 July 2011 13:26, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
The vast majority of people are happy with where we are at
From what I've read on ML posts, and from what was reported about the last
SotM meeting (I wasn't there), the vast majority of people don't care and
would be happy
What you say mike is mostly reasonable apart from the control bit. It's a
democratically elected nonprofit, so it's hard to cast that as a dictatorship.
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Jul 7, 2011, at 20:47, Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Chris
Actually, the license process has been known about for a long, long time so
it's not this new turnaround you cast it as. In addition, everyone else (bing,
ordnance survey...) has worked with us very reasonably. In fact it's hard to
say near map have been unreasonable, just that they were not
Don't know how I can reply to someone who explicitly declares they don't want
to change their mind or debate.
In amongst the vitriol is perhaps a nugget that's worth responding to, this
idea that somehow everyone on talk-au is 80n's puppet, is of course absurd.
Unless you prove this isn't just
On Jul 8, 2011, at 2:14, Sam Couter s...@couter.id.au wrote:
Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
It's been pointed out that I'm not replying to hundreds of messages
from John Smith, Anthony and friends.
I don't see them as they're automatically deleted. I find life is
better without
Sam
Underlaying your attacks is the notion that I dismiss people who disagree with
me, or that I can't understand different points of view. I find that strange
given my rational responses to several disagreements on this list and outlaying
where I feel misunderstandings have come from. I have
On Jul 8, 2011, at 2:57, Sam Couter s...@couter.id.au wrote:
Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
We've gone to insanely long lengths to make that the case, including getting
clarifications from Ordnance Survey, Nearmap and many others. As far as I'm
aware there are no remaining issues as
On Jul 8, 2011, at 3:10, Sam Couter s...@couter.id.au wrote:
SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Sam
Underlaying your attacks is the notion that I dismiss people who disagree
with me, or that I can't understand different points of view. I find that
strange given my rational responses
On Jul 8, 2011, at 3:11, Sam Couter s...@couter.id.au wrote:
SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
As it happens however, my view that John smith and others are trolls is
widely held. And unless you have anything to discuss other than you
believing what I write to be bullshit I'm afraid you
11 matches
Mail list logo
