On 2014-01-17 13:25, Julien Fastré wrote :
Le 16/01/14 22:59, André Pirard a écrit :
On 2014-01-16 18:44, Jo wrote :
Yes, go and ask them for aerial imagery, house numbers, building
contours, PT data from TEC and STIB/MIVB.
And if it's a by the piece permission, first of all the boundaries
Hi,
We sent our opinion yesterday (thanks to Philippe).
You may read the final document here :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Belgian_OSM_contributor_Opinion_to_plan_strat%C3%A9gique_geomatique_wallonne.pdf
Julien
(I do not understand why my links are transformed into pictures... I
Hi,
With the great help of Philippe Duchesnes, we wrote a single an common
review of the PSGW.
Could you give us some comments before we send this ? Our deadline is
very short (this monday, end afternoon - the initial text was submitted
to our wiki).
The RC text :
Hi,
@Ben : I had contact with Philippe D. who works on this topic.
The idea was to synchronize the OSM and OKFN work on this topic, but
give back two advices. We are thinking that repeating things twice may
have a bigger impact... (We do not know if this is true...)
@all :
I have a question
The chapter about open source in strategic plan is there :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Contacts_with_local_autorities/Wallonia/R%C3%A9flexion_des_contributeurs_OSM_sur_le_projet_de_plan_strat%C3%A9gique_pour_la_Wallonie#Les_manques
And, please, give me feedback about
First of all Julien: thanks for all your hard work and enthusiasm in taking
on this task! :-)
I think it is pretty obvious that we would want to promote usage of
open-source as well but I think this is something that is not the task of
our community.
We can recommend using open-source tools but
Hi Julien,
My 5 ct:
I would mention open source as open formats more as a recommendation.
If we are talking about Open Data, the most important part is that the
dataset has an open license. From the moment there is an open license
which complies to the open definition, all the rest is policy
Hi Julien,
You mention we have permission to trace from Bing. In the mean time we have
better imagery (higher resolution, more recent) in Flanders and Brussels
provided by AGIV, which we are also allowed to trace. We also have
permission to, if I understood correctly, to use their WMS (or is that
Hi,
Ben, Pieter,
I do not have any opposition as joining OKFN and OSM opinion in one
document. I thought it was more strategic to have two voices, but I am
not sure this reasoning match with reality.
I propose to write differently the chapter about open source in a way
which is more pragmatic.
Hi Julien,
I already read part of your comments but I will try and have a closer look
soon... I also received word that OKFN is doing the same. Maybe we could
merge this work with theirs?
Best Regards,
Ben
___
Talk-be mailing list
Hi,
I pushed on the wiki a draft for an answer to SPW / Waaloon REgio about
their strategic plan geomatica.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Contacts_with_local_autorities/Wallonia/R%C3%A9flexion_des_contributeurs_OSM_sur_le_projet_de_plan_strat%C3%A9gique_pour_la_Wallonie
Hi,
I posted on the wiki the strategic plan for the geomatics in Wallonia :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Projet_de_plan_strat%C3%A9gique_g%C3%A9omatique_pour_la_Wallonie_%28Belgique%29.pdf
I began to read it and I will write down some advices in the next days.
I created a page
12 matches
Mail list logo
