Bonjour Frank,
Thank for the comments. I'll see what can be done.
I have been assigned to some other projects. I'll try to keep in touch with the
community (as NRCan contact) but I'm not in charge of the Canvec conversion
process anymore.
I should transfer the process to someone else but
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Bégin, Daniel
daniel.be...@rncan-nrcan.gc.ca wrote:
Bonjour Frank,
Thank for the comments. I'll see what can be done.
I have been assigned to some other projects. I'll try to keep in touch with
the community (as NRCan contact) but I'm not in charge of the
I've been working on improving the Barrie, Ontario area, and I'm
trying to figure out what is going on with/what to do about Lake
Simcoe.
There are multiple CanVec-imported ways that together make up a fairly
detailed, accurate representation of the lake. A single low-detail way
[1] is
On 11-05-30 09:15 PM, Me (Gmail) wrote:
I've been working on improving the Barrie, Ontario area, and I'm
trying to figure out what is going on with/what to do about Lake
Simcoe.
There are multiple CanVec-imported ways that together make up a fairly
detailed, accurate representation of the lake.
Barrie area was probably my import before we had OSM files from CanVec.
Can't remember. I think the duplicate is because at the time I couldn't get
an answer on what to do with the coastline. But since the lake is self
contained it can probably be deleted.
Michael
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 4:33
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Frank Steggink stegg...@steggink.org wrote:
The Canvec version is clearly better, so the lowres version can be deleted.
Ok, I've deleted the low-res version, including nodes that weren't
part of anything else. Thanks for the help.
6 matches
Mail list logo