Re: [Talk-ca] Advice on Addressing

2013-05-27 Thread Andrew Buck
Individual buildings is definitely preferable to interpolation ways. For adding address coverage in Fargo, ND, I used the 'audio mapping' technique detailed on the wiki while riding my bike up one sidewalk and then down the other on each street. It goes very fast and works very well. I also

Re: [Talk-ca] Advice on Addressing

2013-05-27 Thread Stewart Russell
I was pretty disappointed with the results I got from (mapquest's) Nominatim when I tried to geocode Doors Open Toronto's data. I found about a third of the results were clearly wrong, and haven't eyeballed the rest on a map to see how far off they are. Toronto's got pretty good address range

Re: [Talk-ca] Advice on Addressing

2013-05-27 Thread Paul Norman
Individual addresses are always preferable to interpolation lines, interpolation lines are just an approximation so if you have all the addresses in a block you shouldn't also have interpolation lines as the latter duplicates the former. As for how to tag the addresses, if they're buildings

[Talk-ca] Toronto on the Wiki...

2013-05-27 Thread Colin McGregor
I was looking at the Toronto, ON entry in the OSM wiki : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Toronto . Some of the material is out of date... Any thoughts as to how best to fix things? Thanks. Colin McGregor ___ Talk-ca mailing list

Re: [Talk-ca] Advice on Addressing

2013-05-27 Thread Harald Kliems
Much has already been said. A good tool to collect housenumbers on an Android phone is keypadmapper: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/KeypadMapper I've mostly mapped interpolation lines in my Montreal neighborhood. The problem here is that each apartment has an individual housenumber, meaning

Re: [Talk-ca] Toronto on the Wiki...

2013-05-27 Thread Steve Singer
On Mon, 27 May 2013, Colin McGregor wrote: I was looking at the Toronto, ON entry in the OSM wiki : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Toronto . Some of the material is out of date... Any thoughts as to how best to fix things? Just do it, it's a low edit volume wiki page if people don't like