On 2016-01-13 09:27 AM, Paul Ramsey wrote: > > I hope OSM is happy to take > address points!
I hope they (we?) are too. I suspect ranges suffice for Metrolinx. If you're in a residential area, you have to consider that addresses are within the uncertainty of a GPS device. You might as well use ranges, as they (generally) are more efficient on storage. cheers, Stewart _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca