Sorry - this was meant for the group
- Original Message -
From: Richard Moss rich...@richardmoss.co.uk
To: Donald Allwright donald_allwri...@yahoo.com
Sent: Wed 11/11/09 22:29
Subject: Fwd: Re: [Talk-gb-midanglia] Cambridgeshire Guided Bus
I've found a sign I photographed 10
Spamming random people is not a good idea, but I would love to be alerted if
the particular change I'm about to upload will introduce (what look like)
errors in the data. That would mean integrating keepright or similar code
directly into the editor, or else adding a 'lint' API where the editor
On 11/11/2009 10:39, Richard Mann wrote:
I found this a useful summary of the UK copyright position:
http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p09_fair_use
That's about the general concept.
This was the reason for my comment that our use on a street map would be
akin to news reporting
On 11 Nov 2009, at 10:39, Richard Mann wrote:
I found this a useful summary of the UK copyright position:
http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p09_fair_use
This was the reason for my comment that our use on a street map
would be akin to news reporting (ie - to me - a simple way of
Ed Loach wrote:
Why do we have to try and get multiple logos rendered on Mapnik,
rather than anyone who wants to use different renderings in a
specific area rendering their own? They have access to the data
after all.
Indeed. We shouldn't even be thinking of adding the LU roundel to the
Peter Miller wrote:
Can I suggest that we 'inform' them of out intentions to use the logo
unless we are told 'no' together and a sample of what it would look
like and our interpretation of copyright law. We should avoid 'asking'
them as such and then needing a positive 'yes' from them.
I
Rather than going round in circles speculating over the position of the
Underground roundel, I've now sent off a message asking:
---
To: saskiaboer...@tfl.gov.uk
Subj: Roundel logo on map
Dear Saskia,
I'm writing to ask you about the use of the London Underground roundel
logo to
On 11 Nov 2009, at 12:26, David Earl wrote:
Rather than going round in circles speculating over the position of
the
Underground roundel, I've now sent off a message asking:
Great stuff. Thanks Dave.
I do also agree with Richard in that there are numerous possible map
styles emphasising
2009/11/11 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
Ed Loach wrote:
Why do we have to try and get multiple logos rendered on Mapnik,
rather than anyone who wants to use different renderings in a
specific area rendering their own? They have access to the data
after all.
Indeed. We shouldn't
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
Ed Loach wrote:
Why do we have to try and get multiple logos rendered on Mapnik,
rather than anyone who wants to use different renderings in a
specific area rendering their own? They have access to the data
On 11/11/2009 12:40, Peter Miller wrote:
I do also agree with Richard in that there are numerous possible map
styles emphasising many different sorts of features in a lot of
different languages
Sure, but there are some that are so iconic they are the expectation.
And as others said and
On 11/11/2009 12:44, Peter Childs wrote:
OSM also has the advantage that you can render your map your self, If
you want Yellow Primary Roads, London Transport Symbol for train
stations etc etc then go ahead, If you infridge copy right on your own
rendering its not in the OSM data so OSM can't
Nicely worded letter David.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of David Earl
Sent: 11 November 2009 12:27 PM
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Adding some additional building
At a rough count we have now have NaPTAN imported for about 1/3 of GB
(41 imported, 7 requesting an import and 90 that have not requested
one).[1] We have no authorities where someone as blocked an import any
more - one person did request a 'wait and see' on the first import but
has now
Peter Miller peter.mil...@... writes:
At a rough count we have now have NaPTAN imported for about 1/3 of GB
Secondly, would it be appropriate at some point to import the data for
all authorities where someone has not specifically asked for it not to
be imported?
I think the NaPTAN import
Peter Miller wrote:
At a rough count we have now have NaPTAN imported for about 1/3 of GB
(41 imported, 7 requesting an import and 90 that have not requested
one).[1] We have no authorities where someone as blocked an import any
more - one person did request a 'wait and see' on the
On 11 Nov 2009, at 18:06, Chris Hill wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
At a rough count we have now have NaPTAN imported for about 1/3 of
GB
(41 imported, 7 requesting an import and 90 that have not requested
one).[1] We have no authorities where someone as blocked an import
any
more - one
17 matches
Mail list logo
