On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Peter Miller wrote:
ITO are pleased to offer out updated version of OSM Analysis with a thematic
overview page allowing us to see how we are getting on in different parts of
the county.
To get the top prize 95% of the roads represented in OS Locator need to be
in OSM
Hello everyone,
If anyone's thinking of Denver this summer here's Hurricane's announcement to
talk about travel discounts. Would be great if everyone from the UK seriously
thinking of going could sign up on the wiki page so that we can get this
discount sorted as soon as is feasible, before
There is a road in Southwark with two incorrect names listed against it:
Correct: Gibbons Rents
Major error: Gibbons Rent
Minor error: Gibbon's Rent
As you can only have one value for not:name, how can I tag to indicate
both of these errors?
Tom
--
http://tom.acrewoods.net
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 10:40 +, Bob Kerr wrote:
I am presently doing some tracing in Dumfries and there is a way which
is marked public_transport=pay_scale_area. It is part of a Naptan
import. The area seems to be vague and is cutting across a number of
areas where I am doing some
TfL seems to be well on board with the developer community on this project
which has collected speed limits for London. Would it be worth someone
contacting them to see if they would allow it to be used in osm? I guess it
may all be wrapped up some mapping copyright though.
On 8 February 2011 16:46, Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net wrote:
There is a road in Southwark with two incorrect names listed against it:
Correct: Gibbons Rents
Major error: Gibbons Rent
Minor error: Gibbon's Rent
As you can only have one value for not:name, how can I tag to indicate
both
Hi there,
We have one small footpath that I have already tagged with not:name=Gibbons
Rent, but now I see OS Locator also seems to have an entry with the
bounding box for the same footpath with Gibbon's Rent.
I could split the way in two and add the different values to each section,
which seems
On 08/02/2011 16:46, Tom Chance wrote:
There is a road in Southwark with two incorrect names listed against it:
Correct: Gibbons Rents
Major error: Gibbons Rent
Minor error: Gibbon's Rent
Strange. Back in 1875, they mapped it as Gibbon's Rents:
8 matches
Mail list logo
